Psychological flexibility or inflexibility: examining the distinct roles of these transdiagnostic factors in mild traumatic brain injury recovery

OBJECTIVE: Psychological flexibility (PF) and psychological inflexibility (PI) are transdiagnostic processes implicated in mental health outcomes, yet their distinct roles in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) recovery remain unclear. This study examined PF and PI in a treatment-seeking mTBI sample and tested whether these processes operate through distinct pathways linking post-concussion symptoms (PCS), functional disability, and psychological distress. METHOD: Participants were 173 adults with mTBI recruited from outpatient concussion rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Participants completed measures of PCS (Rivermead Postconcussion Symptom Questionnaire), disability (WHODAS-12), psychological distress (DASS-21), PI (reactive avoidance; AAQ-ABI), and PF (Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index; PPFI). Structural equation modeling tested a parallel mediation model in which PCS and disability predicted distress indirectly via PI and PF. Three models were estimated, substituting PPFI facets (behavioral engagement, acceptance, harnessing). RESULTS: Across the three structural equation models, overall model fit was adequate, with the behavioral engagement model demonstrating excellent fit. Higher reactive avoidance was consistently associated with greater psychological distress, and a history of a mental health conditions, across all models. Reactive avoidance mediated the relationship between PCS and distress in the behavioral engagement and harnessing models. Behavioral engagement and acceptance were each independently associated with lower psychological distress, whereas harnessing showed a small positive association with distress. These facets did not mediate the relationship between PCS and psychological distress. No serial mediation effects between reactive avoidance and PF on psychological distress were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that PF and PI represent related but distinct transdiagnostic processes shaping psychological outcomes following mTBI. Reactive avoidance emerged as a key mechanism linking PCS to psychological distress, while behavioral engagement and acceptance were independently associated with lower distress. By delineating these processes, the findings extend existing mTBI research and offer clinically relevant insights with the potential to inform transdiagnostic psychological interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2707991
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological flexibility or inflexibility: examining the distinct roles of these transdiagnostic factors in mild traumatic brain injury recovery

Josh W. Faulkner, Molly Cairncross
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Psychological flexibility or inflexibility: examining the distinct roles of these transdiagnostic factors in mild traumatic brain injury recovery

Josh W. Faulkner, Molly Cairncross
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Psychological flexibility (PF) and psychological inflexibility (PI) are transdiagnostic processes implicated in mental health outcomes, yet their distinct roles in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) recovery remain unclear. This study examined PF and PI in a treatment-seeking mTBI sample and tested whether these processes operate through distinct pathways linking post-concussion symptoms (PCS), functional disability, and psychological distress. METHOD: Participants were 173 adults with mTBI recruited from outpatient concussion rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Participants completed measures of PCS (Rivermead Postconcussion Symptom Questionnaire), disability (WHODAS-12), psychological distress (DASS-21), PI (reactive avoidance; AAQ-ABI), and PF (Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index; PPFI). Structural equation modeling tested a parallel mediation model in which PCS and disability predicted distress indirectly via PI and PF. Three models were estimated, substituting PPFI facets (behavioral engagement, acceptance, harnessing). RESULTS: Across the three structural equation models, overall model fit was adequate, with the behavioral engagement model demonstrating excellent fit. Higher reactive avoidance was consistently associated with greater psychological distress, and a history of a mental health conditions, across all models. Reactive avoidance mediated the relationship between PCS and distress in the behavioral engagement and harnessing models. Behavioral engagement and acceptance were each independently associated with lower psychological distress, whereas harnessing showed a small positive association with distress. These facets did not mediate the relationship between PCS and psychological distress. No serial mediation effects between reactive avoidance and PF on psychological distress were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that PF and PI represent related but distinct transdiagnostic processes shaping psychological outcomes following mTBI. Reactive avoidance emerged as a key mechanism linking PCS to psychological distress, while behavioral engagement and acceptance were independently associated with lower distress. By delineating these processes, the findings extend existing mTBI research and offer clinically relevant insights with the potential to inform transdiagnostic psychological interventions.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Simon Fraser University (CA), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute (CA), BC Children's Hospital (CA)
Michael Smith Health Research BC, Health Research Council of New Zealand
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.