Firm structure, organisational capacity, and employer health insurance provision in Oman: a cross-sectional mediation study

Employer mandates are a central mechanism for expanding universal health coverage (UHC). In Oman, the Dhamani platform a national digital health-insurance system mandates private-sector coverage under Capital Market Authority Resolution 78/2019. Full national rollout commenced in 2025, creating an urgent need for pre-implementation employer-readiness evidence. To describe formal employer health-insurance provision rates across Omani private-sector firms, to identify firm structural factors independently associated with provision, and to assess whether organisational resource capacity mediates the firm size–provision relationship. Cross-sectional employer survey ( n = 222) conducted prior to full Dhamani enforcement, using stratified purposive sampling by firm size and sector. Multivariable logistic regression (Hosmer–Lemeshow calibration, ROC AUC discrimination, VIF multicollinearity checks, Box–Tidwell linearity test, Firth penalized sensitivity analysis) and bootstrapped mediation analysis (5,000 resamples; bias-corrected 95% CI as primary inferential result) were used. Formal provision was 36.5% overall (95% CI: 30.2–43.1%), ranging from 10.8% among micro-enterprises to 81.0% among large firms (Cramér’s V = 0.573, p < 0.001). Organisational resource capacity was the strongest independent predictor (AOR = 31.51, 95% CI: 11.82–84.01, p < 0.001). The bootstrapped indirect effect of firm size on provision through capacity was 0.413 (bias-corrected 95% CI: 0.189–0.687), representing 30.3% of the total association. Model discrimination was good (ROC AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83–0.93) and calibration was acceptable (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.45). A post-stratification weighted estimate adjusting for micro-enterprise oversampling was 21.9% (95% CI: 17.0–26.8%). The most common barriers among non-insuring firms were absence of a legal mandate (51.8%) and high premium costs (49.6%). Firm size and organisational resource capacity are strongly associated with formal health-insurance provision. Phased Dhamani enrollment targeting large firms first, premium subsidies, and administrative support for micro- and small enterprises are the evidence-indicated policy responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Economics Review
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-026-00831-y
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firm structure, organisational capacity, and employer health insurance provision in Oman: a cross-sectional mediation study

Z Al Sulti, Neetu Kwatra, Nihad Al Zadjali, Sultana Al Sabahi
Health Economics Review
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Firm structure, organisational capacity, and employer health insurance provision in Oman: a cross-sectional mediation study

Z Al Sulti, Neetu Kwatra, Nihad Al Zadjali, Sultana Al Sabahi
article en

Abstract

Employer mandates are a central mechanism for expanding universal health coverage (UHC). In Oman, the Dhamani platform a national digital health-insurance system mandates private-sector coverage under Capital Market Authority Resolution 78/2019. Full national rollout commenced in 2025, creating an urgent need for pre-implementation employer-readiness evidence. To describe formal employer health-insurance provision rates across Omani private-sector firms, to identify firm structural factors independently associated with provision, and to assess whether organisational resource capacity mediates the firm size–provision relationship. Cross-sectional employer survey ( n = 222) conducted prior to full Dhamani enforcement, using stratified purposive sampling by firm size and sector. Multivariable logistic regression (Hosmer–Lemeshow calibration, ROC AUC discrimination, VIF multicollinearity checks, Box–Tidwell linearity test, Firth penalized sensitivity analysis) and bootstrapped mediation analysis (5,000 resamples; bias-corrected 95% CI as primary inferential result) were used. Formal provision was 36.5% overall (95% CI: 30.2–43.1%), ranging from 10.8% among micro-enterprises to 81.0% among large firms (Cramér’s V = 0.573, p < 0.001). Organisational resource capacity was the strongest independent predictor (AOR = 31.51, 95% CI: 11.82–84.01, p < 0.001). The bootstrapped indirect effect of firm size on provision through capacity was 0.413 (bias-corrected 95% CI: 0.189–0.687), representing 30.3% of the total association. Model discrimination was good (ROC AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83–0.93) and calibration was acceptable (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.45). A post-stratification weighted estimate adjusting for micro-enterprise oversampling was 21.9% (95% CI: 17.0–26.8%). The most common barriers among non-insuring firms were absence of a legal mandate (51.8%) and high premium costs (49.6%). Firm size and organisational resource capacity are strongly associated with formal health-insurance provision. Phased Dhamani enrollment targeting large firms first, premium subsidies, and administrative support for micro- and small enterprises are the evidence-indicated policy responses.

Health Economics Review
Ministry of Health (OM), University of Technology and Applied Sciences - Al Mussanah (OM)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.