The effect of bispectral index-controlled sedation on postoperative cognitive health in elderly patients with spinal anesthesia undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty: randomized, blinded study

Abstract Background Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) commonly affects elderly patients, but the impact of BIS-guided sedation during elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia remains unclear. The aim was to compare BIS-controlled versus standard clinically guided sedation on POCD in elderly patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty. Methods This was a prospective, patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical study. Participants were randomized into two groups: BIS-targeted sedation (BIS group > 70) and standard clinical sedation (non-BIS group). All patients received the same anesthetic and analgesic. The primary outcome was the change in cognitive function over time. Cognitive function was assessed four times using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination–Revised (ACE-R) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. The emotional status was evaluated two times using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) . Results Ninety-two patients (46 per group) were included in the final analysis. No statistically significant differences in total ACE-R score were found between the two groups at any time point ( p > 0.05). Within the BIS group, total ACE-R scores were significantly higher on postoperative day (POD) 90 than preoperatively (PO) (87 (65–96) vs. 92 (70–98), p = 0.007). In the non-BIS group, total ACE-R scores increased significantly at several time points: from PO to 30 POD (87 (48–96) vs. 90.5 (40–98), p = 0.007), from PO to 90 POD (87 (48–96) vs. (91 (40–99), p < 0.001), and from 2 to 30 POD (88 (45–98) vs. 90.5 (40–98), p = 0.005). Significant decline in the number of patients experiencing probable anxiety at 30 POD compared with PO in both groups (BIS 28.3% to 2.2%, p = 0.004; non-BIS 32.6% to 8.7%, p = 0.015). Conclusions This study did not demonstrate superiority of BIS-controlled sedation compared to clinically guided sedation with regard to cognitive outcomes. Further studies are needed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06241859, January 28, 2024)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00437-0
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of bispectral index-controlled sedation on postoperative cognitive health in elderly patients with spinal anesthesia undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty: randomized, blinded study

Inna Jaremko, Andrius Macas, Alfredas Smailys, A Gelmanas et al.
Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

The effect of bispectral index-controlled sedation on postoperative cognitive health in elderly patients with spinal anesthesia undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty: randomized, blinded study

Inna Jaremko, Andrius Macas, Alfredas Smailys, A Gelmanas, Gabrielė Milkintaitė, Tadas Lenkutis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) commonly affects elderly patients, but the impact of BIS-guided sedation during elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia remains unclear. The aim was to compare BIS-controlled versus standard clinically guided sedation on POCD in elderly patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty. Methods This was a prospective, patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical study. Participants were randomized into two groups: BIS-targeted sedation (BIS group > 70) and standard clinical sedation (non-BIS group). All patients received the same anesthetic and analgesic. The primary outcome was the change in cognitive function over time. Cognitive function was assessed four times using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination–Revised (ACE-R) questionnaire. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. The emotional status was evaluated two times using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) . Results Ninety-two patients (46 per group) were included in the final analysis. No statistically significant differences in total ACE-R score were found between the two groups at any time point ( p > 0.05). Within the BIS group, total ACE-R scores were significantly higher on postoperative day (POD) 90 than preoperatively (PO) (87 (65–96) vs. 92 (70–98), p = 0.007). In the non-BIS group, total ACE-R scores increased significantly at several time points: from PO to 30 POD (87 (48–96) vs. 90.5 (40–98), p = 0.007), from PO to 90 POD (87 (48–96) vs. (91 (40–99), p < 0.001), and from 2 to 30 POD (88 (45–98) vs. 90.5 (40–98), p = 0.005). Significant decline in the number of patients experiencing probable anxiety at 30 POD compared with PO in both groups (BIS 28.3% to 2.2%, p = 0.004; non-BIS 32.6% to 8.7%, p = 0.015). Conclusions This study did not demonstrate superiority of BIS-controlled sedation compared to clinically guided sedation with regard to cognitive outcomes. Further studies are needed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06241859, January 28, 2024)

Journal of Anesthesia Analgesia and Critical Care
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.