Scaling up genomic newborn screening: implementation lessons from the BabyScreen+ study

Interest in the potential of population-based genomic sequencing is growing. However, integrating a large-scale screening program into an already complex healthcare system is challenging. The implementation of gNBS needs a thorough understanding of the process. The purpose of this study is to investigate how gNBS can be integrated into the Australian health system and delivered at scale. Embedded within the BabyScreen+ study, we utilised a research design informed by process mapping and phenomenology. Fifty-one semi-structured interviews with parents (n = 33), healthcare providers (n = 15), and BabyScreen+ study team members (n = 8) were conducted. Additionally, we analysed the operational team meeting minutes. A baseline process map, developed in consultation with team members, consisted of six stages: 1. Raising awareness of the screening program; 2. Offer; 3. Participant enrolment and consent; 4. Sample collection; 5. Testing; and 6. Result disclosure and management. We recorded changes made over the study period to inform the post-implementation process map. Most changes occurred at stages: 1. Raising awareness, 4. Sample collection and 5. Testing. Lastly, a process map to inform the scale up of screening, was developed. Four key aspects of the gNBS process needing modification are: (1) growing awareness of screening amongst the public and HCPs; (2) building flexibility and accessibility into the consent process; (3) developing automation capabilities and infrastructure for large-scale sequencing and analysis, and (4) dedicated referral processes for infants who receive high-chance results. These findings demonstrate key system-level considerations and provide a foundation for implementing genomic newborn screening at scale within existing healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02192-w
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaling up genomic newborn screening: implementation lessons from the BabyScreen+ study

Sebastian Lunke, Anaita Kanga‐Parabia, Jade Caruana, Lilian Downie et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Scaling up genomic newborn screening: implementation lessons from the BabyScreen+ study

Sebastian Lunke, Anaita Kanga‐Parabia, Jade Caruana, Lilian Downie, Erin Tutty, Zornitza Stark, Stephanie Best, Katrina L. Scarff, Nitzan Lang, Nathasha Kugenthiran, Alison D. Archibald
article en

Abstract

Interest in the potential of population-based genomic sequencing is growing. However, integrating a large-scale screening program into an already complex healthcare system is challenging. The implementation of gNBS needs a thorough understanding of the process. The purpose of this study is to investigate how gNBS can be integrated into the Australian health system and delivered at scale. Embedded within the BabyScreen+ study, we utilised a research design informed by process mapping and phenomenology. Fifty-one semi-structured interviews with parents (n = 33), healthcare providers (n = 15), and BabyScreen+ study team members (n = 8) were conducted. Additionally, we analysed the operational team meeting minutes. A baseline process map, developed in consultation with team members, consisted of six stages: 1. Raising awareness of the screening program; 2. Offer; 3. Participant enrolment and consent; 4. Sample collection; 5. Testing; and 6. Result disclosure and management. We recorded changes made over the study period to inform the post-implementation process map. Most changes occurred at stages: 1. Raising awareness, 4. Sample collection and 5. Testing. Lastly, a process map to inform the scale up of screening, was developed. Four key aspects of the gNBS process needing modification are: (1) growing awareness of screening amongst the public and HCPs; (2) building flexibility and accessibility into the consent process; (3) developing automation capabilities and infrastructure for large-scale sequencing and analysis, and (4) dedicated referral processes for infants who receive high-chance results. These findings demonstrate key system-level considerations and provide a foundation for implementing genomic newborn screening at scale within existing healthcare systems.

European Journal of Human Genetics
The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (AU), Zoos Victoria (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.