Beyond women’s burden: integrating male partners into contraceptive decision-making

Contraceptive use and family planning have traditionally been viewed as women’s responsibility, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite growing evidence highlighting the positive impact of male involvement in improving contraceptive uptake, continuation, and reproductive health outcomes, the participation of male partners remains limited. This review explores the critical role of male partners in contraceptive decision-making and synthesizes current evidence on the barriers impeding their participation. It further identifies strategies and interventions to foster shared responsibility in family planning and promote equitable reproductive health practices. A narrative review approach was adopted to collate global and regional evidence from peer-reviewed literature, policy reports, and relevant case studies. The review is structured around five core themes: sociocultural and gender norms, knowledge and educational barriers, limitations within healthcare systems, misconceptions around male contraceptive methods, and systemic challenges to implementation. The review also presents innovative, context-sensitive strategies for male engagement and future directions to enhance male participation in family planning. The analysis reveals that male involvement remains suboptimal due to persistent patriarchal norms, misinformation, stigma, and limited access to male-centric contraceptive options. Existing family planning programs often lack couple-focused counseling and fail to provide inclusive services for men. However, interventions such as couple-based education, male-friendly clinics, community advocacy, gamified digital tools, and AI-enabled reproductive health platforms show promise in shifting attitudes and improving engagement. Success stories from countries including Tanzania, Vietnam, and India provide evidence for scalable, culturally adaptive models that facilitate male involvement. Strengthening male participation is pivotal for achieving equitable reproductive health outcomes. Multi-level strategies, such as spanning education, service delivery, community norms, and policy integration, are essential to promote shared responsibility. Addressing systemic barriers, expanding male contraceptive choices, and leveraging technology can catalyze behavioral change and contribute to more inclusive, effective, and sustainable family planning programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-026-00465-9
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond women’s burden: integrating male partners into contraceptive decision-making

Mishu Mangla, Priyanka Garg
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Beyond women’s burden: integrating male partners into contraceptive decision-making

Mishu Mangla, Priyanka Garg
article en

Abstract

Contraceptive use and family planning have traditionally been viewed as women’s responsibility, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite growing evidence highlighting the positive impact of male involvement in improving contraceptive uptake, continuation, and reproductive health outcomes, the participation of male partners remains limited. This review explores the critical role of male partners in contraceptive decision-making and synthesizes current evidence on the barriers impeding their participation. It further identifies strategies and interventions to foster shared responsibility in family planning and promote equitable reproductive health practices. A narrative review approach was adopted to collate global and regional evidence from peer-reviewed literature, policy reports, and relevant case studies. The review is structured around five core themes: sociocultural and gender norms, knowledge and educational barriers, limitations within healthcare systems, misconceptions around male contraceptive methods, and systemic challenges to implementation. The review also presents innovative, context-sensitive strategies for male engagement and future directions to enhance male participation in family planning. The analysis reveals that male involvement remains suboptimal due to persistent patriarchal norms, misinformation, stigma, and limited access to male-centric contraceptive options. Existing family planning programs often lack couple-focused counseling and fail to provide inclusive services for men. However, interventions such as couple-based education, male-friendly clinics, community advocacy, gamified digital tools, and AI-enabled reproductive health platforms show promise in shifting attitudes and improving engagement. Success stories from countries including Tanzania, Vietnam, and India provide evidence for scalable, culturally adaptive models that facilitate male involvement. Strengthening male participation is pivotal for achieving equitable reproductive health outcomes. Multi-level strategies, such as spanning education, service delivery, community norms, and policy integration, are essential to promote shared responsibility. Addressing systemic barriers, expanding male contraceptive choices, and leveraging technology can catalyze behavioral change and contribute to more inclusive, effective, and sustainable family planning programs.

Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
Central University of Punjab (IN), Government Medical College and Hospital (IN), Government Medical College and Hospital (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.