Which dimensions of clear teaching are most important? Dominance analysis and random forests

Instructional clarity is an effective teaching behavior that has consistently been linked to positive classroom outcomes. Because instructional clarity is multidimensional, college instructors should know which dimensions are most important for predicting student success. We asked 434 students to report on their experiences in a college classroom to investigate how five clarity dimensions (i.e., fluency, reducing working memory overload, interaction, coherence, and structure) predicted variables associated with students’ ability (i.e., organization and extraneous cognitive load) and motivation (i.e., perceptions of cost and self-efficacy) to process course material and to determine which dimensions were more (or less) important. Using dominance analysis and random forests, results indicated that all dimensions of instructor clarity were valuable. Reducing students’ working memory overload was deemed highly important for variables associated with students’ ability and motivation to process course information. Structure also stood out for its impact on variables associated with students’ ability to process course information.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2026.2706584
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which dimensions of clear teaching are most important? Dominance analysis and random forests

Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan
Communication Quarterly
School Choice and Performance
article

Which dimensions of clear teaching are most important? Dominance analysis and random forests

Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan
article en

Abstract

Instructional clarity is an effective teaching behavior that has consistently been linked to positive classroom outcomes. Because instructional clarity is multidimensional, college instructors should know which dimensions are most important for predicting student success. We asked 434 students to report on their experiences in a college classroom to investigate how five clarity dimensions (i.e., fluency, reducing working memory overload, interaction, coherence, and structure) predicted variables associated with students’ ability (i.e., organization and extraneous cognitive load) and motivation (i.e., perceptions of cost and self-efficacy) to process course material and to determine which dimensions were more (or less) important. Using dominance analysis and random forests, results indicated that all dimensions of instructor clarity were valuable. Reducing students’ working memory overload was deemed highly important for variables associated with students’ ability and motivation to process course information. Structure also stood out for its impact on variables associated with students’ ability to process course information.

Communication Quarterly
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which dimensions of clear teaching are most important? Dominance analysis and random forests — Alan K. Goodboy, San Bolkan · Communication Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS