Power shifts in logistics triads: strategies, capabilities and reconfiguration

Purpose The study investigates how power dynamics impact logistics outsourcing in New Zealand, specifically focusing on the relationships between customers, suppliers and logistics service providers (LSPs). Design/methodology/approach A qualitative multiple-case study approach was employed. Six logistics triads (totalling 18 organisations) across diverse New Zealand industries were selected. Data were collected through 30 semi-structured interviews with senior logistics professionals from all three parties within each triad. Findings The research reveals that LSPs' development of distinctive resource capabilities acts as a key trigger for power dependency shifts within the triad. In response, the focal firm strategically adapts its relationship management based on the comparison between its own power and the collective power of the two non-focal firms. When facing a relative power disadvantage, the focal firm adopts a risk-averse selective alliance strategy, collaborating with one non-focal firm while deliberately preventing collaboration between the other two to mitigate the risk of a counter-coalition. Conversely, when holding a relative power advantage, the focal firm pursues a profit-maximising inclusive collaboration strategy, fostering cooperation with both non-focal firms to enhance overall efficiency and shared profits, while accepting transactional dynamics between them if collaboration is unprofitable. New Zealand's specific context amplifies these dynamics and the strategic significance of LSP capabilities. Originality/value This study offers significant originality by: (1) integrating Resource Dependency Theory and Network Theory to provide a novel, capability-centric lens on triadic power evolution, moving beyond purely structural perspectives; (2) Empirically demonstrating the critical and active role of LSP resource capabilities as catalysts for power shifts and strategic adaptation by the focal firm, challenging generic treatments of the third party; (3) Contextualising triad dynamics within New Zealand's unique business environment, highlighting how market constraints shape strategic choices; and (4) Developing four empirically grounded propositions explaining the mechanisms linking LSP capabilities, power asymmetry, and focal firm strategic responses. This integrated framework provides new insights for practitioners managing complex three-party logistics relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Logistics Management
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-09-2025-0576
Primary Topic
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power shifts in logistics triads: strategies, capabilities and reconfiguration

Wen Luo, Yangyan Shi, Mengmeng Nan
The International Journal of Logistics Management
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
article

Power shifts in logistics triads: strategies, capabilities and reconfiguration

Wen Luo, Yangyan Shi, Mengmeng Nan
article en

Abstract

Purpose The study investigates how power dynamics impact logistics outsourcing in New Zealand, specifically focusing on the relationships between customers, suppliers and logistics service providers (LSPs). Design/methodology/approach A qualitative multiple-case study approach was employed. Six logistics triads (totalling 18 organisations) across diverse New Zealand industries were selected. Data were collected through 30 semi-structured interviews with senior logistics professionals from all three parties within each triad. Findings The research reveals that LSPs' development of distinctive resource capabilities acts as a key trigger for power dependency shifts within the triad. In response, the focal firm strategically adapts its relationship management based on the comparison between its own power and the collective power of the two non-focal firms. When facing a relative power disadvantage, the focal firm adopts a risk-averse selective alliance strategy, collaborating with one non-focal firm while deliberately preventing collaboration between the other two to mitigate the risk of a counter-coalition. Conversely, when holding a relative power advantage, the focal firm pursues a profit-maximising inclusive collaboration strategy, fostering cooperation with both non-focal firms to enhance overall efficiency and shared profits, while accepting transactional dynamics between them if collaboration is unprofitable. New Zealand's specific context amplifies these dynamics and the strategic significance of LSP capabilities. Originality/value This study offers significant originality by: (1) integrating Resource Dependency Theory and Network Theory to provide a novel, capability-centric lens on triadic power evolution, moving beyond purely structural perspectives; (2) Empirically demonstrating the critical and active role of LSP resource capabilities as catalysts for power shifts and strategic adaptation by the focal firm, challenging generic treatments of the third party; (3) Contextualising triad dynamics within New Zealand's unique business environment, highlighting how market constraints shape strategic choices; and (4) Developing four empirically grounded propositions explaining the mechanisms linking LSP capabilities, power asymmetry, and focal firm strategic responses. This integrated framework provides new insights for practitioners managing complex three-party logistics relationships.

The International Journal of Logistics Management
Waikato Institute of Technology (NZ), Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN), Capital University of Economics and Business (CN), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.