Development of a multi-criteria decision-making tool for effective additive manufacturing technology selection in the Egyptian industry

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) offers significant advantages over conventional manufacturing, including reduced material waste, high precision, and tailored mechanical properties. However, the rapid proliferation of AM technologies complicates technology selection, especially in emerging contexts such as Egypt, where local economic conditions, material availability, and technical expertise impose constraints. This study develops a decision-support tool for selecting the most suitable AM technology for the Egyptian industry using a fuzzy VIKOR-based multi-criteria decision-making framework. Eleven criteria, identified through a survey of Egyptian professionals, cover application suitability and material/technical compatibility. Three candidate technologies, namely fused deposition modeling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA), are evaluated using linguistic judgments from three decision-makers converted to triangular fuzzy numbers. FDM ranks first with Q=0, followed by SLS (Q=0.22) and SLA (Q=1.0). FDM’s superiority is attributed to its strong performance on compatibility with plastics/polymers, which is the predominant material class in Egyptian AM usage (67%) as revealed by a conducted survey. A systematic sensitivity analysis (varying each criterion weight by ±10% and ±20%) reveals that FDM remains top-ranked in 88.6% of scenarios. SLS becomes optimal in 11.4% of scenarios, specifically when increased emphasis is placed on design review or laser-based technology compatibility. SLA never achieves top ranking. The proposed framework provides a transparent, context-appropriate tool enabling Egyptian manufacturers to select AM technologies aligned with local capabilities, reducing investment risks and enhancing industrial competitiveness. The methodology is adaptable to other emerging economies facing similar constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-026-01142-z
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a multi-criteria decision-making tool for effective additive manufacturing technology selection in the Egyptian industry

Asmaa Hagag, Tamer F. Abdelmaguid, Laila Yousef
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Development of a multi-criteria decision-making tool for effective additive manufacturing technology selection in the Egyptian industry

Asmaa Hagag, Tamer F. Abdelmaguid, Laila Yousef
article en

Abstract

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) offers significant advantages over conventional manufacturing, including reduced material waste, high precision, and tailored mechanical properties. However, the rapid proliferation of AM technologies complicates technology selection, especially in emerging contexts such as Egypt, where local economic conditions, material availability, and technical expertise impose constraints. This study develops a decision-support tool for selecting the most suitable AM technology for the Egyptian industry using a fuzzy VIKOR-based multi-criteria decision-making framework. Eleven criteria, identified through a survey of Egyptian professionals, cover application suitability and material/technical compatibility. Three candidate technologies, namely fused deposition modeling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA), are evaluated using linguistic judgments from three decision-makers converted to triangular fuzzy numbers. FDM ranks first with Q=0, followed by SLS (Q=0.22) and SLA (Q=1.0). FDM’s superiority is attributed to its strong performance on compatibility with plastics/polymers, which is the predominant material class in Egyptian AM usage (67%) as revealed by a conducted survey. A systematic sensitivity analysis (varying each criterion weight by ±10% and ±20%) reveals that FDM remains top-ranked in 88.6% of scenarios. SLS becomes optimal in 11.4% of scenarios, specifically when increased emphasis is placed on design review or laser-based technology compatibility. SLA never achieves top ranking. The proposed framework provides a transparent, context-appropriate tool enabling Egyptian manufacturers to select AM technologies aligned with local capabilities, reducing investment risks and enhancing industrial competitiveness. The methodology is adaptable to other emerging economies facing similar constraints.

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 73(1)
Ministry of Industry and Trade (CZ), Cairo University (EG), Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (EG), Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (EG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.