Gut microbiome composition differs between aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation patients

The gut microbiome has emerged as an important modulator of cardiovascular diseases, yet data on aortic valve disorders, particularly aortic stenosis (AS), remain limited. This study aimed to characterize gut microbiome differences in patients with bicuspid (BS) and tricuspid aortic stenosis (TS) using aortic regurgitation (AR) patients as a clinically comparable control group with similar age distribution, comorbidities, and metabolic profiles. A total of 122 patients were included in this prospective cross-sectional study: 33 AR, 22 BS, and 67 TS patients. Microbiome profiling was conducted from anal swabs using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Beta diversity was assessed via UniFrac distances, and computed redundancy analysis was performed using linear discriminant analysis effect size. The groups were largely homogeneous regarding most clinical characteristics; AR patients showed only marginally worse renal function, while BS patients were slightly younger with fewer cases of diabetes. In beta diversity analyses, both TS and BS patients exhibited clearly distinct microbiome compositions compared with AR controls, independent of clinical parameters used as potential confounders. TS and BS patients differed only minimally from each other. AR patients showed higher abundances of Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Lachnoclostridium, and Alistipes, whereas AS patients exhibited increased levels of Corynebacterium, Anaerococcus, Peptoniphilus, and Finegoldia. Co-abundance network analysis revealed that AS patients displayed an extensive and highly interconnected bacterial network, characterized by strong correlations among taxa such as Bacteroides, Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Faecalibacterium, rather than isolated changes in individual taxa. AR patients provide a clinically suitable control group for AS. AS patients show a distinct microbiome composition and a highly interconnected microbial network with three major hubs, warranting further mechanistic investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63354-w
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gut microbiome composition differs between aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation patients

Farhad Bakhtiary, Ansgar Ackerschott, Benedikt Bartsch, Marwan Hamiko et al.
Scientific Reports
Gut microbiota and health
article

Gut microbiome composition differs between aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation patients

Farhad Bakhtiary, Ansgar Ackerschott, Benedikt Bartsch, Marwan Hamiko, Marijo Parčina, Muntadher Al Zaidi, Christian Kurts, Sebastian Zimmer, Raúl Nicolás Jamin, Christina Weisheit, Nikola Lübbering, Svetozar Nesic, Hannah Billig, Chiara Hesse, Georg Nickenig, Axel Schott
article en

Abstract

The gut microbiome has emerged as an important modulator of cardiovascular diseases, yet data on aortic valve disorders, particularly aortic stenosis (AS), remain limited. This study aimed to characterize gut microbiome differences in patients with bicuspid (BS) and tricuspid aortic stenosis (TS) using aortic regurgitation (AR) patients as a clinically comparable control group with similar age distribution, comorbidities, and metabolic profiles. A total of 122 patients were included in this prospective cross-sectional study: 33 AR, 22 BS, and 67 TS patients. Microbiome profiling was conducted from anal swabs using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Beta diversity was assessed via UniFrac distances, and computed redundancy analysis was performed using linear discriminant analysis effect size. The groups were largely homogeneous regarding most clinical characteristics; AR patients showed only marginally worse renal function, while BS patients were slightly younger with fewer cases of diabetes. In beta diversity analyses, both TS and BS patients exhibited clearly distinct microbiome compositions compared with AR controls, independent of clinical parameters used as potential confounders. TS and BS patients differed only minimally from each other. AR patients showed higher abundances of Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Lachnoclostridium, and Alistipes, whereas AS patients exhibited increased levels of Corynebacterium, Anaerococcus, Peptoniphilus, and Finegoldia. Co-abundance network analysis revealed that AS patients displayed an extensive and highly interconnected bacterial network, characterized by strong correlations among taxa such as Bacteroides, Alistipes, Parabacteroides, and Faecalibacterium, rather than isolated changes in individual taxa. AR patients provide a clinically suitable control group for AS. AS patients show a distinct microbiome composition and a highly interconnected microbial network with three major hubs, warranting further mechanistic investigation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Bonn (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.