Effectiveness of upper and mid-thoracic spine mobilization in individuals with mechanical neck pain: a randomized control trial

Abstract Background Neck pain imposes a considerable burden on the healthcare system worldwide and it ranks fourth globally as the leading contributor to years lived with disability. In the United States alone, neck pain affects 30% to 50% of adults annually and persists in up to 75% of individuals even a year after initial onset of symptoms. Manual therapy with therapeutic exercises are common interventions for mechanical neck pain (MNP), but relatively few studies have investigated the effectiveness of thoracic spine mobilization (TSM) for MNP. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of TSM combined with usual physiotherapy (trial group) to usual physiotherapy only (control group). Methods Seventy-nine participants with MNP were randomized into either the trial or control groups. Treatment involved 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with a pre-assessment (baseline) and post-assessment performed. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), cervical range of motion (ROM), McGill pain questionnaire and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were the outcome measures. Parametric tests ( independent- t ; paired- t) and non-parametric tests ( Mann Whitney- U; Wilcoxon sign ranked ) were used as appropriate for data analysis. Results The trial group demonstrated statistically significant reduction in VAS, NDI scores and increase in cervical flexion ROM. Within group analysis showed a clinically significant improvement in pain intensity, ROM and NDI. McGill pain characteristics became significantly decreased for both between and within group analysis. Conclusion The combination of upper and mid-TSM with usual physiotherapy demonstrated superior clinical outcomes ( p < 0.05) for MNP patients compared to usual physiotherapy alone. Trial registration CTRI/2020/06/026090 registered 20 June 2020, https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/rmaindet.php?trialid=43162&EncHid=11467.39474&modid=1&compid=19 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43161-026-00370-x
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of upper and mid-thoracic spine mobilization in individuals with mechanical neck pain: a randomized control trial

Parvin Akter, Zannatul Firdawsi, William Reed, James H. Rimmer et al.
Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Effectiveness of upper and mid-thoracic spine mobilization in individuals with mechanical neck pain: a randomized control trial

Parvin Akter, Zannatul Firdawsi, William Reed, James H. Rimmer, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Nazmul Hassan, M Sarwar Hossain
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Neck pain imposes a considerable burden on the healthcare system worldwide and it ranks fourth globally as the leading contributor to years lived with disability. In the United States alone, neck pain affects 30% to 50% of adults annually and persists in up to 75% of individuals even a year after initial onset of symptoms. Manual therapy with therapeutic exercises are common interventions for mechanical neck pain (MNP), but relatively few studies have investigated the effectiveness of thoracic spine mobilization (TSM) for MNP. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of TSM combined with usual physiotherapy (trial group) to usual physiotherapy only (control group). Methods Seventy-nine participants with MNP were randomized into either the trial or control groups. Treatment involved 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with a pre-assessment (baseline) and post-assessment performed. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), cervical range of motion (ROM), McGill pain questionnaire and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were the outcome measures. Parametric tests ( independent- t ; paired- t) and non-parametric tests ( Mann Whitney- U; Wilcoxon sign ranked ) were used as appropriate for data analysis. Results The trial group demonstrated statistically significant reduction in VAS, NDI scores and increase in cervical flexion ROM. Within group analysis showed a clinically significant improvement in pain intensity, ROM and NDI. McGill pain characteristics became significantly decreased for both between and within group analysis. Conclusion The combination of upper and mid-TSM with usual physiotherapy demonstrated superior clinical outcomes ( p < 0.05) for MNP patients compared to usual physiotherapy alone. Trial registration CTRI/2020/06/026090 registered 20 June 2020, https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/rmaindet.php?trialid=43162&EncHid=11467.39474&modid=1&compid=19 .

Bulletin of Faculty of Physical TherapyVol. 31(1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (BD), Jahangirnagar University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.