Counting missing babies in Tanzania: Neonatal mortality data quality from Tanzania’s District Health Information System across 28 Regional and 7 Tertiary hospitals (2015–2024)

INTRODUCTION: The Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 targets reducing the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) to <12 per 1,000 live births by 2030; however, 65 countries, including Tanzania, remain off track. The 2022/23 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) reported an NMR of 24 per 1,000 live births, equivalent to 48,000 neonatal deaths annually. METHODS: Neonatal deaths were extracted from the District Health Information System (DHIS2) for 28 Regional Referral Hospitals (RRHs) and seven tertiary hospitals from 2015 to 2024. Data quality was assessed by: (1) completeness, as the proportion of months each hospital reported neonatal deaths; (2) internal consistency, comparing mean NMR for 2021-2023 with 2024 following WHO guidance; and (3) external plausibility, comparing DHIS2 with DHS and UN estimates. For seven hospitals implementing NEST360 program, NMRs from DHIS2 were compared with the Neonatal Inpatient Dataset (NID) for 2021 and 2024. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2024, DHIS2 recorded an average of >8,500 neonatal deaths annually versus 48,000 expected. RRHs accounted for 30-40% of reported deaths, and tertiary hospitals for 4-11%. Overall monthly reporting completeness was 58.3%, higher in RRHs (median 61.7%, IQR 8.3-95.0%) than in tertiary hospitals (median 50%, IQR 0.8-73.3%), with only 8 RRHs (28.5%) and no tertiary hospital achieving >75% reporting. Only 28.6% of hospitals had internal consistency (NMR within ±33% of the mean) for 2021-2023. The DHIS2 NMR for 2024 was 5.9 per 1,000 (adjusted for ~20% home births), compared to 24 per 1,000 in DHS 2022/23. Compared with NEST360 NID, one tertiary hospital reported lower DHIS2 NMRs, and three RRHs reported higher (ratio >1). CONCLUSION: Neonatal mortality reporting in Tanzania's DHIS2 remains substantially under-captured, with notable variations across facilities. Although RRHs perform better than tertiary hospitals, overall data quality remains low. Improving reporting in underperforming facilities and leveraging high-performing RRHs can strengthen national neonatal mortality monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348874
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counting missing babies in Tanzania: Neonatal mortality data quality from Tanzania’s District Health Information System across 28 Regional and 7 Tertiary hospitals (2015–2024)

Audêncio Victor, Rebecca E. Penzias, Nahya Salim Masoud, Ahmad Makuwani et al.
PLoS ONE
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Counting missing babies in Tanzania: Neonatal mortality data quality from Tanzania’s District Health Information System across 28 Regional and 7 Tertiary hospitals (2015–2024)

Audêncio Victor, Rebecca E. Penzias, Nahya Salim Masoud, Ahmad Makuwani, Jacqueline Minja, Eric O. Ohuma, James Cross, Josephine Shabani, Honorati Masanja, Irabi Kassim, Prosper Mshana, Lucas Malla, Felix Bundala, Christine Bohne, Morris Ondieki, Claud Kumalija, Habib Ismail, Jennie Jaribu, Joy E. Lawn
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 targets reducing the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) to <12 per 1,000 live births by 2030; however, 65 countries, including Tanzania, remain off track. The 2022/23 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) reported an NMR of 24 per 1,000 live births, equivalent to 48,000 neonatal deaths annually. METHODS: Neonatal deaths were extracted from the District Health Information System (DHIS2) for 28 Regional Referral Hospitals (RRHs) and seven tertiary hospitals from 2015 to 2024. Data quality was assessed by: (1) completeness, as the proportion of months each hospital reported neonatal deaths; (2) internal consistency, comparing mean NMR for 2021-2023 with 2024 following WHO guidance; and (3) external plausibility, comparing DHIS2 with DHS and UN estimates. For seven hospitals implementing NEST360 program, NMRs from DHIS2 were compared with the Neonatal Inpatient Dataset (NID) for 2021 and 2024. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2024, DHIS2 recorded an average of >8,500 neonatal deaths annually versus 48,000 expected. RRHs accounted for 30-40% of reported deaths, and tertiary hospitals for 4-11%. Overall monthly reporting completeness was 58.3%, higher in RRHs (median 61.7%, IQR 8.3-95.0%) than in tertiary hospitals (median 50%, IQR 0.8-73.3%), with only 8 RRHs (28.5%) and no tertiary hospital achieving >75% reporting. Only 28.6% of hospitals had internal consistency (NMR within ±33% of the mean) for 2021-2023. The DHIS2 NMR for 2024 was 5.9 per 1,000 (adjusted for ~20% home births), compared to 24 per 1,000 in DHS 2022/23. Compared with NEST360 NID, one tertiary hospital reported lower DHIS2 NMRs, and three RRHs reported higher (ratio >1). CONCLUSION: Neonatal mortality reporting in Tanzania's DHIS2 remains substantially under-captured, with notable variations across facilities. Although RRHs perform better than tertiary hospitals, overall data quality remains low. Improving reporting in underperforming facilities and leveraging high-performing RRHs can strengthen national neonatal mortality monitoring.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (TZ), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Rice University (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Sall Family Foundation, Rice University, Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Lemelson Foundation, Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Family Foundation, ELMA Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.