Research on cascade coal procurement model based on Bi-objective and integer optimization with virtual coal blending calibration

China’s thermal power enterprises generally rely on manual experience while lacking robust modelling and optimisation support for coal procurement, leading to non-optimal economic performance and limited feasibility of procurement schemes. To address these issues, a cascade coal procurement model with two layers is constructed. The outer loop comprehensively considers the effects of pollutant emission on coal cost, as well as seasonal-variation effect from procurement to blending on coal quality, and an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (INSGA-II) is proposed for optimisation. The inner loop further considers vessel capacity and freight charges, and introduces a coal quantity adjustment and substitution mechanism to improve the original inner-loop model against the situation of “low planned coal quantity using high-capacity vessels”. Finally, a virtual coal blending model is constructed to calibrate the inner-loop scheme. Case results show that, compared with the experience-based scheme, the model-based inner-loop scheme reasonably adjusts the procurement quantity in the outer loop while ensuring supply requirements, reducing the cost by 5.75%, and the model-based virtual coal blending scheme not only optimally matches the planned load but also achieves greater economic efficiency. In addition, INSGA-II outperforms NSGA-II in cost–quality trade-off under different weights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2026.2704657
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Optimization Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on cascade coal procurement model based on Bi-objective and integer optimization with virtual coal blending calibration

G Wang, Y WANG, Xiaodi Huang, Qiansheng Li et al.
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Evaluation and Optimization Models
article

Research on cascade coal procurement model based on Bi-objective and integer optimization with virtual coal blending calibration

G Wang, Y WANG, Xiaodi Huang, Qiansheng Li, Yanchen Jiang, Jun Li
article en

Abstract

China’s thermal power enterprises generally rely on manual experience while lacking robust modelling and optimisation support for coal procurement, leading to non-optimal economic performance and limited feasibility of procurement schemes. To address these issues, a cascade coal procurement model with two layers is constructed. The outer loop comprehensively considers the effects of pollutant emission on coal cost, as well as seasonal-variation effect from procurement to blending on coal quality, and an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (INSGA-II) is proposed for optimisation. The inner loop further considers vessel capacity and freight charges, and introduces a coal quantity adjustment and substitution mechanism to improve the original inner-loop model against the situation of “low planned coal quantity using high-capacity vessels”. Finally, a virtual coal blending model is constructed to calibrate the inner-loop scheme. Case results show that, compared with the experience-based scheme, the model-based inner-loop scheme reasonably adjusts the procurement quantity in the outer loop while ensuring supply requirements, reducing the cost by 5.75%, and the model-based virtual coal blending scheme not only optimally matches the planned load but also achieves greater economic efficiency. In addition, INSGA-II outperforms NSGA-II in cost–quality trade-off under different weights.

Journal of the Operational Research Society
Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Evaluation and Optimization Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.