Comparative Performance Analysis of Five Magnetometers for Geomagnetic Monitoring

Magnetometers are essential for monitoring the Earth’s magnetic field in applications such as geophysics, space weather, navigation, and volcanic studies. While professional-grade instruments provide high reliability, their cost limits spatial coverage, particularly in remote regions. This study presents a comparative analysis of five ground-based magnetometers deployed simultaneously at Universidad Adventista de Chile (36.64° S, 71.99° W) from 5–8 August 2025. Noise, signal stability, and response to geomagnetic variations were evaluated, emphasizing the influence of ambient temperature. Fluxgate and subsurface-deployed instruments showed higher consistency and reduced thermal sensitivity, while low-cost magneto-inductive sensors exhibited strong linear temperature dependence, sometimes with temporal delays. Inter-instrument correlation analyses highlighted performance differences and the trade-offs between cost and reliability. The results demonstrate that low-cost magnetometers, if carefully deployed and calibrated, can complement professional-grade sensors, improve spatial coverage, and provide valuable geomagnetic observations in regions with limited infrastructure and logistical constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26154700
Primary Topic
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance Analysis of Five Magnetometers for Geomagnetic Monitoring

Adriana Godoy, Manuel Bravo, B. Urra, M. V. Stepanova et al.
Sensors
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
article

Comparative Performance Analysis of Five Magnetometers for Geomagnetic Monitoring

Adriana Godoy, Manuel Bravo, B. Urra, M. V. Stepanova, V. A. Pinto, E. Ovalle, Sony Su Chen, Loreto Castro, Joaquín Díaz Peña, E. Carrasco, C. M. Denardini, Enrique Rojo, Guillermo Caro
article en

Abstract

Magnetometers are essential for monitoring the Earth’s magnetic field in applications such as geophysics, space weather, navigation, and volcanic studies. While professional-grade instruments provide high reliability, their cost limits spatial coverage, particularly in remote regions. This study presents a comparative analysis of five ground-based magnetometers deployed simultaneously at Universidad Adventista de Chile (36.64° S, 71.99° W) from 5–8 August 2025. Noise, signal stability, and response to geomagnetic variations were evaluated, emphasizing the influence of ambient temperature. Fluxgate and subsurface-deployed instruments showed higher consistency and reduced thermal sensitivity, while low-cost magneto-inductive sensors exhibited strong linear temperature dependence, sometimes with temporal delays. Inter-instrument correlation analyses highlighted performance differences and the trade-offs between cost and reliability. The results demonstrate that low-cost magnetometers, if carefully deployed and calibrated, can complement professional-grade sensors, improve spatial coverage, and provide valuable geomagnetic observations in regions with limited infrastructure and logistical constraints.

SensorsVol. 26(15)
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (MX), Universidad Adventista de Chile (CL), University of Chile (CL), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.