Thrombectomy with the Tigertriever Appears to be a Safe Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Abstract The Tigertriever, a next-generation adjustable stent retriever, represents an advancement in thrombectomy for acute cerebral infarction. This study aimed to compare its clinical effectiveness and safety with those of conventional stent retrievers. In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed patients who underwent thrombectomy for acute cerebral infarction at our hospital between January 2023 and June 2025. Participants were divided into two groups: those treated with the Tigertriever and those treated with other conventional stent retrievers. Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching with a caliper of 0.2) was performed to adjust for baseline differences. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05. After PSM, 100 patients (50 matched pairs) were included in the study. Successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b) was achieved in 37 patients (74.0%) in the Tigertriever group and 36 patients (72.0%) in the conventional stent group. The time from puncture to recanalization was 34 minutes (21–45 minutes) in the Tigertriever group and 27 minutes (20–45 minutes) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 0.432). First-pass recanalization was achieved in 12 patients (24.0%) in the Tigertriever group and 17 patients (34.0%) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 0.378). Device-related bleeding complications occurred in two cases (4.0%) in the Tigertriever group and one case (2.0%) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 1.0). Postoperative deaths occurred in three cases (6.0%) in the Tigertriever group and seven cases (14%) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 0.318). A favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at 3 months) was observed in 26 patients (52.0%) in the Tigertriever group and 33 patients (66.0%) in the conventional group. Thrombectomy using the Tigertriever demonstrated comparable recanalization rates, procedural times, safety, and functional outcomes to conventional stent retrievers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1825843
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thrombectomy with the Tigertriever Appears to be a Safe Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Hiroshi Aikawa, Masanobu Yasumoto, Kosuke Takigawa, Takashi Fujii et al.
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Thrombectomy with the Tigertriever Appears to be a Safe Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Hiroshi Aikawa, Masanobu Yasumoto, Kosuke Takigawa, Takashi Fujii, Kousei Maruyama, Yoshimasa Fukui, Kiyoshi Kazekawa, Shuta Maehara, Masahiro Yasaka, Noriaki Tashiro, Yoshinori Go
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Tigertriever, a next-generation adjustable stent retriever, represents an advancement in thrombectomy for acute cerebral infarction. This study aimed to compare its clinical effectiveness and safety with those of conventional stent retrievers. In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed patients who underwent thrombectomy for acute cerebral infarction at our hospital between January 2023 and June 2025. Participants were divided into two groups: those treated with the Tigertriever and those treated with other conventional stent retrievers. Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching with a caliper of 0.2) was performed to adjust for baseline differences. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05. After PSM, 100 patients (50 matched pairs) were included in the study. Successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b) was achieved in 37 patients (74.0%) in the Tigertriever group and 36 patients (72.0%) in the conventional stent group. The time from puncture to recanalization was 34 minutes (21–45 minutes) in the Tigertriever group and 27 minutes (20–45 minutes) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 0.432). First-pass recanalization was achieved in 12 patients (24.0%) in the Tigertriever group and 17 patients (34.0%) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 0.378). Device-related bleeding complications occurred in two cases (4.0%) in the Tigertriever group and one case (2.0%) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 1.0). Postoperative deaths occurred in three cases (6.0%) in the Tigertriever group and seven cases (14%) in the non-Tigertriever group (p = 0.318). A favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at 3 months) was observed in 26 patients (52.0%) in the Tigertriever group and 33 patients (66.0%) in the conventional group. Thrombectomy using the Tigertriever demonstrated comparable recanalization rates, procedural times, safety, and functional outcomes to conventional stent retrievers.

Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
South Osaka Neurosurgical Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.