Intermittent Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized complication in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) that has become more common over the past decade. While intermittent subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (sUFH) is used for VTE prophylaxis in adults, there is limited evidence guiding its use in the pediatric population. sUFH offers advantages for patients with renal dysfunction, limited intravenous access, or uncertain surgical plans due to its short half-life, reversibility, and ease of titration. Given the paucity of pediatric data, further characterization of its prophylactic use is warranted. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included PICU patients (≤ 18 years) at a single quaternary pediatric hospital (July 2014-June 2024) who received sUFH for VTE prophylaxis for ≥ 24 h. Data collected included dosing, frequency, monitoring, incidence of bleeding, and incidence of VTE. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The median dose administered was 89.3 units/kg (IQR, 73.5-109.6), with dosing intervals evenly divided between every 8 and 12 h. Seven patients (11%) developed VTE and 16 patients (24%) experienced bleeding. Median doses did not differ significantly between those with and without VTE (109.6 vs. 84.7 units/kg, p = 0.6) or bleeding (86.9 vs. 89.1 units/kg, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, bleeding events were more common than thrombotic events and occurred in 24% of patients, while VTE developed in 11%. These findings highlight the need for more standardized dosing strategies and further prospective evaluation to better define the safety and effectiveness of sUFH for VTE prophylaxis in the PICU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1545-5017.70524
Primary Topic
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intermittent Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients

Matthew K. Leroue, Michele Loi, Kelli Jo Welter, Autumn M. Spyhalsky et al.
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
article

Intermittent Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients

Matthew K. Leroue, Michele Loi, Kelli Jo Welter, Autumn M. Spyhalsky, S. Gordon, Mackenzie N. DeVine
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized complication in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) that has become more common over the past decade. While intermittent subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (sUFH) is used for VTE prophylaxis in adults, there is limited evidence guiding its use in the pediatric population. sUFH offers advantages for patients with renal dysfunction, limited intravenous access, or uncertain surgical plans due to its short half-life, reversibility, and ease of titration. Given the paucity of pediatric data, further characterization of its prophylactic use is warranted. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included PICU patients (≤ 18 years) at a single quaternary pediatric hospital (July 2014-June 2024) who received sUFH for VTE prophylaxis for ≥ 24 h. Data collected included dosing, frequency, monitoring, incidence of bleeding, and incidence of VTE. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The median dose administered was 89.3 units/kg (IQR, 73.5-109.6), with dosing intervals evenly divided between every 8 and 12 h. Seven patients (11%) developed VTE and 16 patients (24%) experienced bleeding. Median doses did not differ significantly between those with and without VTE (109.6 vs. 84.7 units/kg, p = 0.6) or bleeding (86.9 vs. 89.1 units/kg, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, bleeding events were more common than thrombotic events and occurred in 24% of patients, while VTE developed in 11%. These findings highlight the need for more standardized dosing strategies and further prospective evaluation to better define the safety and effectiveness of sUFH for VTE prophylaxis in the PICU.

Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.