Citation Intent Classification via Exponential Borda Fusion and SciBERT

This study presents a clear and reliable framework for classifying the intent behind scientific citations. It combines multi-model reasoning with concepts from social choice theory. Instead of using a single model, this framework employs three open Large Language Models Gemma, LLaMA, and Mistral. Additionally, we combine their ranked outputs using an exponentially weighted Borda method. By doing so, this approach increases agreement among high-confidence predictions, maintains ranking information, and produces stable, high-quality supervision signals. Consequently, it boosts reliability while remaining transparent. To create a strong experimental basis, we built a large, balanced dataset from the UnarXive corpus, which contains structured full-text scientific articles and citation networks. First, we automatically pulled citation contexts and organized them within a DuckDB-based analytical setup. Then, we rebalanced the dataset across rhetorical categories to enhance representativeness and minimize bias. Finally, we categorized each citation context into one of five roles: background, methodology, comparison, extension, or critique. As a result, the resulting dataset provides a robust foundation for training and evaluation. We trained a SciBERT classifier using these ensemble-generated annotations and tested it on a five-category citation intent classification task. The model achieved a macro F1-score of 0.83, an outstanding result for this type of classification. Indeed, this level of performance shows strong reliability given how challenging it is to differentiate closely related citation functions. Moreover, it demonstrates that combining multiple models produces valuable and distinct supervision signals, capturing subtle rhetorical and semantic patterns that single models often overlook. Furthermore, the framework enhances interpretability. Specifically, the explicit weighting system clarifies how each model contributes to the final outcome. In addition, the deterministic tie-breaking method ensures the outputs are consistent and reproducible. Taken together, these design choices maintain explainability without sacrificing effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a19080612
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citation Intent Classification via Exponential Borda Fusion and SciBERT

Ahmed Zellou, Omar Zahour, Saad Belefqih, Mohammed Barchane et al.
Algorithms
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Citation Intent Classification via Exponential Borda Fusion and SciBERT

Ahmed Zellou, Omar Zahour, Saad Belefqih, Mohammed Barchane, El habib Ben lahmar
article en

Abstract

This study presents a clear and reliable framework for classifying the intent behind scientific citations. It combines multi-model reasoning with concepts from social choice theory. Instead of using a single model, this framework employs three open Large Language Models Gemma, LLaMA, and Mistral. Additionally, we combine their ranked outputs using an exponentially weighted Borda method. By doing so, this approach increases agreement among high-confidence predictions, maintains ranking information, and produces stable, high-quality supervision signals. Consequently, it boosts reliability while remaining transparent. To create a strong experimental basis, we built a large, balanced dataset from the UnarXive corpus, which contains structured full-text scientific articles and citation networks. First, we automatically pulled citation contexts and organized them within a DuckDB-based analytical setup. Then, we rebalanced the dataset across rhetorical categories to enhance representativeness and minimize bias. Finally, we categorized each citation context into one of five roles: background, methodology, comparison, extension, or critique. As a result, the resulting dataset provides a robust foundation for training and evaluation. We trained a SciBERT classifier using these ensemble-generated annotations and tested it on a five-category citation intent classification task. The model achieved a macro F1-score of 0.83, an outstanding result for this type of classification. Indeed, this level of performance shows strong reliability given how challenging it is to differentiate closely related citation functions. Moreover, it demonstrates that combining multiple models produces valuable and distinct supervision signals, capturing subtle rhetorical and semantic patterns that single models often overlook. Furthermore, the framework enhances interpretability. Specifically, the explicit weighting system clarifies how each model contributes to the final outcome. In addition, the deterministic tie-breaking method ensures the outputs are consistent and reproducible. Taken together, these design choices maintain explainability without sacrificing effectiveness.

AlgorithmsVol. 19(8)
Mohammed V University (MA), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.