Hemispheric specialization for imitating hand-head positions and finger configurations – A study with hemispherectomy individuals

= 2 with a remaining right hemisphere (rRH)). Imitation performance was analysed with the NEUROGES®-ELAN system, considering error types and reaction times. Bayesian analyses revealed no group differences in performance scores, error types and reaction times for HP or FP imitation. The qualitative analysis of error types revealed group differences, particularly for FP imitation, with rRH individuals showing predominantly self-corrections, whereas rLH individuals showed diverse error patterns (e.g., position errors). However, considerable interindividual variability was foremost observed across imitation tasks and subtypes. Overall, the findings do not support a strict hemispheric specialization for HP and FP imitation following hemispherectomy. Rather, they highlight the importance of individual variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650x.2026.2702358
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemispheric specialization for imitating hand-head positions and finger configurations – A study with hemispherectomy individuals

Augenstein Mk, Alain Ptito, Laura Ketter, Hedda Lausberg
Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Hemispheric specialization for imitating hand-head positions and finger configurations – A study with hemispherectomy individuals

Augenstein Mk, Alain Ptito, Laura Ketter, Hedda Lausberg
article en

Abstract

= 2 with a remaining right hemisphere (rRH)). Imitation performance was analysed with the NEUROGES®-ELAN system, considering error types and reaction times. Bayesian analyses revealed no group differences in performance scores, error types and reaction times for HP or FP imitation. The qualitative analysis of error types revealed group differences, particularly for FP imitation, with rRH individuals showing predominantly self-corrections, whereas rLH individuals showed diverse error patterns (e.g., position errors). However, considerable interindividual variability was foremost observed across imitation tasks and subtypes. Overall, the findings do not support a strict hemispheric specialization for HP and FP imitation following hemispherectomy. Rather, they highlight the importance of individual variability.

Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), German Sport University Cologne (DE), McGill University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.