One-time bonuses, limited returns: a statewide factorial vignette experiment of law enforcement retention intentions

Abstract Objectives Experimentally test whether retention bonus conditions impact law enforcement officers’ willingness to extend their employment. Methods Officers from a stratified-random sample of sixteen agencies responded to a vignette that randomized the amount of a one-time bonus and obligation to repay if the officer leaves within 3-years. OLS models estimate bonus conditions on willingness to remain, including moderating effects of pre-experiment retention intentions. Results Most were likely to stay for an additional period if they received the bonus (87.4%). Neither bonus amount nor repayment obligation impacted willingness to remain. Officers with higher baseline retention intentions were significantly more likely to extend their employment. Those planning to leave were more responsive to larger bonuses but remained unlikely to stay longer. Conclusions Retention bonuses could reinforce commitment among officers planning to stay, but are unlikely to influence those at-risk of leaving. Reducing turnover might require organizational change, rather than one-time incentives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-026-09771-3
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One-time bonuses, limited returns: a statewide factorial vignette experiment of law enforcement retention intentions

Jessica Huff, Cory P. Haberman, Brenna Dunlap, Bradley J. O’Guinn et al.
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

One-time bonuses, limited returns: a statewide factorial vignette experiment of law enforcement retention intentions

Jessica Huff, Cory P. Haberman, Brenna Dunlap, Bradley J. O’Guinn, P. Trey Bussey
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Experimentally test whether retention bonus conditions impact law enforcement officers’ willingness to extend their employment. Methods Officers from a stratified-random sample of sixteen agencies responded to a vignette that randomized the amount of a one-time bonus and obligation to repay if the officer leaves within 3-years. OLS models estimate bonus conditions on willingness to remain, including moderating effects of pre-experiment retention intentions. Results Most were likely to stay for an additional period if they received the bonus (87.4%). Neither bonus amount nor repayment obligation impacted willingness to remain. Officers with higher baseline retention intentions were significantly more likely to extend their employment. Those planning to leave were more responsive to larger bonuses but remained unlikely to stay longer. Conclusions Retention bonuses could reinforce commitment among officers planning to stay, but are unlikely to influence those at-risk of leaving. Reducing turnover might require organizational change, rather than one-time incentives.

Journal of Experimental Criminology
Florida International University (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.