Working Right Ways: Investigating Health Practitioners' Perspectives of Challenges and Barriers to Providing Good Foot Care With and for First Nations Peoples

BACKGROUND: Ongoing colonisation of the land now known of Australia includes Western hegemony in biomedical knowledge systems dominating healthcare provision. Racism remains structurally entrenched in Australian systems of health and wellbeing. This has serious implications for First Nations foot health outcomes. The purpose of this work is to empower First Nations-led codesign of ways of working in foot health research to investigate challenges to attending, and barriers to providing, good foot care with and for First Nations Peoples. METHODS: Aboriginal Participatory Action Research ways of working in this study are documented in previous publication; 'Working right ways in foot health with and for First Nations Peoples: research method guided and governed by First Nations ways of knowing, being, and doing in cross-sectional qualitative study design'. First Nations-led study design used decolonised language in semi-structured interviewing to talk with consenting participants. Data analysis included all transcripts being anonymised and transcribed verbatim by researchers manually. First Nations-led ways of doing thematic analysis was agreed upon by all authors. RESULTS: Two talking points discussed First Nations and non-Indigenous health practitioners' perspectives of providing good foot care with and for First Nations Peoples: (1) What challenges exist in attending individual/organisational services? (2) What are barriers to providing good foot care? In interviews, themes emerged of relationships, disempowerment, education, and clinical governance. Additionally, racism, distance, and funding were perceived as influencing foot care provision. Although not themed, the constructs of time and their importance, were interwoven through results. CONCLUSION: Participants described relationships which were not culturally centred, nor longer term, and which therefore limited trust, as being a challenge to attending foot health services. This research identified service barriers to providing good foot care with and for First Nations Peoples as distance and funding. Compounding barriers was lack of health professional cultural capability education impacting clinical services; this being dependant on individuals' behaviours and knowledges, and services' governance. Further work needs to centre the cultures and leadership of First Nations individuals, families, and Communities in working with and for them to keep feet strong.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70179
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working Right Ways: Investigating Health Practitioners' Perspectives of Challenges and Barriers to Providing Good Foot Care With and for First Nations Peoples

V. Chuter, James Gerrard, Kim Whiteley, James Charles et al.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Working Right Ways: Investigating Health Practitioners' Perspectives of Challenges and Barriers to Providing Good Foot Care With and for First Nations Peoples

V. Chuter, James Gerrard, Kim Whiteley, James Charles, Shirley Godwin (Badimaya Yamatji)
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ongoing colonisation of the land now known of Australia includes Western hegemony in biomedical knowledge systems dominating healthcare provision. Racism remains structurally entrenched in Australian systems of health and wellbeing. This has serious implications for First Nations foot health outcomes. The purpose of this work is to empower First Nations-led codesign of ways of working in foot health research to investigate challenges to attending, and barriers to providing, good foot care with and for First Nations Peoples. METHODS: Aboriginal Participatory Action Research ways of working in this study are documented in previous publication; 'Working right ways in foot health with and for First Nations Peoples: research method guided and governed by First Nations ways of knowing, being, and doing in cross-sectional qualitative study design'. First Nations-led study design used decolonised language in semi-structured interviewing to talk with consenting participants. Data analysis included all transcripts being anonymised and transcribed verbatim by researchers manually. First Nations-led ways of doing thematic analysis was agreed upon by all authors. RESULTS: Two talking points discussed First Nations and non-Indigenous health practitioners' perspectives of providing good foot care with and for First Nations Peoples: (1) What challenges exist in attending individual/organisational services? (2) What are barriers to providing good foot care? In interviews, themes emerged of relationships, disempowerment, education, and clinical governance. Additionally, racism, distance, and funding were perceived as influencing foot care provision. Although not themed, the constructs of time and their importance, were interwoven through results. CONCLUSION: Participants described relationships which were not culturally centred, nor longer term, and which therefore limited trust, as being a challenge to attending foot health services. This research identified service barriers to providing good foot care with and for First Nations Peoples as distance and funding. Compounding barriers was lack of health professional cultural capability education impacting clinical services; this being dependant on individuals' behaviours and knowledges, and services' governance. Further work needs to centre the cultures and leadership of First Nations individuals, families, and Communities in working with and for them to keep feet strong.

Journal of Foot and Ankle ResearchVol. 19(3)
Griffith University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Independent Sector (US), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), Bendigo Health (AU), Gold Coast Health (AU), Western Sydney University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.