Ethics in archaeobotany: identifying current issues and initiating a declaration of principles

Abstract This article presents the first systematic assessment of ethical concerns specific to archaeobotanical research, focusing on principles and values. Conducted by an international group of archaeobotanists, the study used an anonymous online survey to document experiences and perceptions within the archaeobotanical community with the aim of raising awareness, identifying prevalent good practices and noting points for improvement. The questionnaire included ten thematic blocks and 63 main questions that covered regulations and guidelines, archaeobotany in excavations, funding, credit and authorship, intellectual property and right to access material, engagement with local communities, research obstacles, misconduct, ecological footprint, and dissemination of research results. We received responses from 114 participants, and the results highlight key challenges, including limited systematic recovery and study of plant remains, scarce funding, unclear decision-making authority, recurrent research misconduct, insufficient benefits for local communities, and low visibility of archaeobotanical research in dissemination and outreach. Building on these findings, we propose a declaration of principles tailored to archaeobotany, outlining the collective commitments of our community. This framework emphasizes safeguarding archaeological plant remains, ethical and rigorous research practices, and equitable participation. By adhering to these principles, archaeobotanists can promote scientific knowledge whilst fostering inclusivity, transparency, and respect for all individuals and communities involved or affected by our research. In this way, the initiative aims to strengthen archaeobotany as a discipline and cultivate a more ethical, inclusive, and collaborative research culture for both current and future generations of archaeobotanists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-026-01139-x
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics in archaeobotany: identifying current issues and initiating a declaration of principles

Carlos G. Santiago-Marrero, Amaia Arranz‐Otaegui, Filipe Costa Vaz, João Pedro Tereso et al.
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Ethics in archaeobotany: identifying current issues and initiating a declaration of principles

Carlos G. Santiago-Marrero, Amaia Arranz‐Otaegui, Filipe Costa Vaz, João Pedro Tereso, Maia Dedrick, Sabrina Bianco, Chantel E. White, India Ella Dilkes-Hall, Smiti Nathan, Claudia Speciale, Marian Berihuete‐Azorín, Stéphanie C. Bodin, Shinya Shoda, Welmoed A. Out, Maria Rousou, W. Robertson Smith, Naomi F. Miller, Sheahan Bestel
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents the first systematic assessment of ethical concerns specific to archaeobotanical research, focusing on principles and values. Conducted by an international group of archaeobotanists, the study used an anonymous online survey to document experiences and perceptions within the archaeobotanical community with the aim of raising awareness, identifying prevalent good practices and noting points for improvement. The questionnaire included ten thematic blocks and 63 main questions that covered regulations and guidelines, archaeobotany in excavations, funding, credit and authorship, intellectual property and right to access material, engagement with local communities, research obstacles, misconduct, ecological footprint, and dissemination of research results. We received responses from 114 participants, and the results highlight key challenges, including limited systematic recovery and study of plant remains, scarce funding, unclear decision-making authority, recurrent research misconduct, insufficient benefits for local communities, and low visibility of archaeobotanical research in dissemination and outreach. Building on these findings, we propose a declaration of principles tailored to archaeobotany, outlining the collective commitments of our community. This framework emphasizes safeguarding archaeological plant remains, ethical and rigorous research practices, and equitable participation. By adhering to these principles, archaeobotanists can promote scientific knowledge whilst fostering inclusivity, transparency, and respect for all individuals and communities involved or affected by our research. In this way, the initiative aims to strengthen archaeobotany as a discipline and cultivate a more ethical, inclusive, and collaborative research culture for both current and future generations of archaeobotanists.

Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
Griffith University (AU), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Museum of London Archaeology (GB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Ministry of Culture (IN), Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties (JP), Santa Clara University (US), University of the Basque Country (ES), Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Moesgaard Museum (DK), Hazenberg Archeologie (Netherlands) (NL), Archol (Netherlands) (NL), Institución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (ES), Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (ES), National Museum of Archaeology (BO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR), Penn Center for AIDS Research (US), Institut Català d'Arqueologia Clàssica (ES), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES), University of Glasgow (GB), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), American School of Classical Studies at Athens (GR)
European Commission, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.