Fixing the Gap: Gendered Use of the Right to Choose Repair

The "right to choose repair" in European consumer law is central to sustainable consumption and consumer protection, yet its effectiveness depends on equitable access and enforcement across all consumer groups. While (consumer) law assumes that gender-neutral legal frameworks ensure equal protection, this premise remains empirically untested in the context of repair rights. This paper presents the first empirical study of gender's role in enforcing the right to choose repair. Based on representative survey data from 3,141 consumers in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, gender-based differences in adherence to the right to choose repair and factors shaping willingness to enforce it are analysed. Results show that women face distinct barriers, including acting less consistently with legal rights and greater sensitivity to procedural obstacles, financial costs, and conflict. The extent and significance of these gender-based barriers vary between national contexts, pointing to targeted policy responses that address gendered patterns in consumer law enforcement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Policy
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-026-09626-4
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fixing the Gap: Gendered Use of the Right to Choose Repair

Helen Pluut, Vanessa Mak, Joasia Luzak, Joerg Weber
Journal of Consumer Policy
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Fixing the Gap: Gendered Use of the Right to Choose Repair

Helen Pluut, Vanessa Mak, Joasia Luzak, Joerg Weber
article en

Abstract

The "right to choose repair" in European consumer law is central to sustainable consumption and consumer protection, yet its effectiveness depends on equitable access and enforcement across all consumer groups. While (consumer) law assumes that gender-neutral legal frameworks ensure equal protection, this premise remains empirically untested in the context of repair rights. This paper presents the first empirical study of gender's role in enforcing the right to choose repair. Based on representative survey data from 3,141 consumers in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, gender-based differences in adherence to the right to choose repair and factors shaping willingness to enforce it are analysed. Results show that women face distinct barriers, including acting less consistently with legal rights and greater sensitivity to procedural obstacles, financial costs, and conflict. The extent and significance of these gender-based barriers vary between national contexts, pointing to targeted policy responses that address gendered patterns in consumer law enforcement.

Journal of Consumer PolicyVol. 49(3)
Leiden University (NL), University of Exeter (GB)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fixing the Gap: Gendered Use of the Right to Choose Repair — Helen Pluut, Vanessa Mak, et al. · Journal of Consumer Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS