A comparative analysis of climate change policy frameworks in China and the US

Climate change is a systemic global crisis characterized by long term shifts in average weather patterns, driven primarily by human activities such as greenhouse gas emissions, land-use change, deforestation, and broader ecological degradation. The phenomenon affects both developed and developing states, shaping policy responses across different political and economic systems. Using a neoclassical realist (NCR) framework, this study investigates the development of climate change policy in the United States and China. The analysis focuses on how domestic institutional structures and state priorities influence each country’s approach to emissions reduction, emissions limits, and renewable energy development. Through a comparative analysis, the study identifies key similarities and differences in their policymaking processes and strategic orientation. The research draws on a wide range of secondary sources, including peer-reviewed articles, government reports, monographs, and policy analysis which are examined using qualitative methods. The findings provide substantial insights into the strategic relations between the United States and China in the context of climate governance, assessing the prospects of coordinated (or diplomatic) emissions reductions and the observance of expanded investments in renewable energy. The study concludes by highlighting the central role of these two powers in shaping the process of global climate regulation and cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2684099
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of climate change policy frameworks in China and the US

Khaled Al-Kassimi, Muhammad Atif, Tabinda Saeed
Cogent Social Sciences
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

A comparative analysis of climate change policy frameworks in China and the US

Khaled Al-Kassimi, Muhammad Atif, Tabinda Saeed
article en

Abstract

Climate change is a systemic global crisis characterized by long term shifts in average weather patterns, driven primarily by human activities such as greenhouse gas emissions, land-use change, deforestation, and broader ecological degradation. The phenomenon affects both developed and developing states, shaping policy responses across different political and economic systems. Using a neoclassical realist (NCR) framework, this study investigates the development of climate change policy in the United States and China. The analysis focuses on how domestic institutional structures and state priorities influence each country’s approach to emissions reduction, emissions limits, and renewable energy development. Through a comparative analysis, the study identifies key similarities and differences in their policymaking processes and strategic orientation. The research draws on a wide range of secondary sources, including peer-reviewed articles, government reports, monographs, and policy analysis which are examined using qualitative methods. The findings provide substantial insights into the strategic relations between the United States and China in the context of climate governance, assessing the prospects of coordinated (or diplomatic) emissions reductions and the observance of expanded investments in renewable energy. The study concludes by highlighting the central role of these two powers in shaping the process of global climate regulation and cooperation.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 12(1)
University of Lahore (PK), American University in the Emirates (AE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.