Anaphylactic Shock Following Administration of Iodinated Computed Tomography (CT) Contrast Media: A Case Series

Anaphylactic shock is a severe and life-threatening allergic reaction that can result from contrast agents used in imaging procedures. Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are indispensable in diagnostic computed tomography (CT), yet they carry a small but serious risk of anaphylactic reactions. Even with low-osmolar, nonionic agents such as iohexol, severe hypersensitivity can occur unpredictably, including in patients with no prior history of allergic reactions. We report a retrospective case series of three patients who experienced anaphylactic shock following administration of ICM during CT imaging at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. Cases were identified through clinical incident reporting and radiology department records. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed according to clinical criteria, requiring an acute onset of symptoms involving compromise of two or more organ systems such as cardiovascular, respiratory, or cutaneous, following intravenous (IV) contrast media exposure. Patient data were extracted from electronic medical records, including clinical notes, nursing observations, laboratory investigations, and imaging reports. Informed consent was obtained from patients, and the report was compiled in accordance with institutional ethical guidelines. Cases 1 and 3 involved female patients with breast cancer receiving iohexol for oncological staging. Case 2 included a male patient with multiple comorbidities who received iodixanol for cardiac evaluation. In all three cases, anaphylaxis developed shortly after IV contrast administration and was successfully managed with epinephrine, corticosteroids, antihistamines, and IV fluid administration. All patients achieved full recovery without long-term complications. These cases underscore the unpredictable nature of contrast-induced anaphylaxis and the critical importance of preprocedural risk assessment, emergency preparedness, and rapid administration of treatment. Even patients without identifiable risk factors may develop life-threatening reactions, emphasizing that all contrast-administering settings must maintain robust emergency protocols.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.113223
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anaphylactic Shock Following Administration of Iodinated Computed Tomography (CT) Contrast Media: A Case Series

Umme Nashrah, Raghad Asim Abdulla Ahmed Shilla, Nissar Shaikh, Umm E Amara
Cureus
Acute Kidney Injury Research
article

Anaphylactic Shock Following Administration of Iodinated Computed Tomography (CT) Contrast Media: A Case Series

Umme Nashrah, Raghad Asim Abdulla Ahmed Shilla, Nissar Shaikh, Umm E Amara
article en

Abstract

Anaphylactic shock is a severe and life-threatening allergic reaction that can result from contrast agents used in imaging procedures. Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are indispensable in diagnostic computed tomography (CT), yet they carry a small but serious risk of anaphylactic reactions. Even with low-osmolar, nonionic agents such as iohexol, severe hypersensitivity can occur unpredictably, including in patients with no prior history of allergic reactions. We report a retrospective case series of three patients who experienced anaphylactic shock following administration of ICM during CT imaging at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. Cases were identified through clinical incident reporting and radiology department records. Anaphylaxis was diagnosed according to clinical criteria, requiring an acute onset of symptoms involving compromise of two or more organ systems such as cardiovascular, respiratory, or cutaneous, following intravenous (IV) contrast media exposure. Patient data were extracted from electronic medical records, including clinical notes, nursing observations, laboratory investigations, and imaging reports. Informed consent was obtained from patients, and the report was compiled in accordance with institutional ethical guidelines. Cases 1 and 3 involved female patients with breast cancer receiving iohexol for oncological staging. Case 2 included a male patient with multiple comorbidities who received iodixanol for cardiac evaluation. In all three cases, anaphylaxis developed shortly after IV contrast administration and was successfully managed with epinephrine, corticosteroids, antihistamines, and IV fluid administration. All patients achieved full recovery without long-term complications. These cases underscore the unpredictable nature of contrast-induced anaphylaxis and the critical importance of preprocedural risk assessment, emergency preparedness, and rapid administration of treatment. Even patients without identifiable risk factors may develop life-threatening reactions, emphasizing that all contrast-administering settings must maintain robust emergency protocols.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anaphylactic Shock Following Administration of Iodinated Computed Tomography (CT) Contrast Media: A Case Series — Umme Nashrah, Raghad Asim Abdulla Ahmed Shilla, et al. · Cureus (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS