Feeling Vulnerable With My AI Companion: Examining Well‐Being in Human‐AI Relationships

ABSTRACT Individuals resort to human‐AI relationships to fulfill psychological, social, and empathetic needs. Nevertheless, dilemmas arise from these interdependent relationships which, although destined to enhance users' well‐being, can also be detrimental to them. By adopting a mixed‐method approach (netnography, n = 1131 posts; survey, n = 610), through the lens of Interdependence Theory , this study investigates characteristics of interdependent human‐AI relationships and how users' vulnerability emerges within those relationships, ultimately affecting their well‐being. Results suggest that users experience dilemmas within relationships with AI companions. Specifically, AI companion's warmth and availability create a “positive” dependence, softening vulnerability and positively influencing well‐being. However, the AI emotional abilities and third‐party company control increase perceptions of relational power imbalance, thus positively influencing vulnerability and negatively influencing well‐being. We provide practical applications centered on app developers integrating protective app features to increase consumers' self‐confidence, coping strategies, self‐worth and benevolence, as well as adopting a collaborative model with consumers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70230
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeling Vulnerable With My AI Companion: Examining Well‐Being in Human‐AI Relationships

Hannah R. Marriott, Liliane Abboud, Valentina Pitardi
Psychology and Marketing
AI in Service Interactions
article

Feeling Vulnerable With My AI Companion: Examining Well‐Being in Human‐AI Relationships

Hannah R. Marriott, Liliane Abboud, Valentina Pitardi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Individuals resort to human‐AI relationships to fulfill psychological, social, and empathetic needs. Nevertheless, dilemmas arise from these interdependent relationships which, although destined to enhance users' well‐being, can also be detrimental to them. By adopting a mixed‐method approach (netnography, n = 1131 posts; survey, n = 610), through the lens of Interdependence Theory , this study investigates characteristics of interdependent human‐AI relationships and how users' vulnerability emerges within those relationships, ultimately affecting their well‐being. Results suggest that users experience dilemmas within relationships with AI companions. Specifically, AI companion's warmth and availability create a “positive” dependence, softening vulnerability and positively influencing well‐being. However, the AI emotional abilities and third‐party company control increase perceptions of relational power imbalance, thus positively influencing vulnerability and negatively influencing well‐being. We provide practical applications centered on app developers integrating protective app features to increase consumers' self‐confidence, coping strategies, self‐worth and benevolence, as well as adopting a collaborative model with consumers.

Psychology and Marketing
University of Surrey (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.