Behind-the-border non-tariff measures, agricultural transaction costs and profitability of commercial cereal farmers in Ghana

Purpose This study examines how behind-the-border non-tariff measures (NTMs) affect the agricultural transaction costs and profitability of commercial cereal farmers in Ghana. Despite the growing importance of NTMs in international trade, empirical evidence on their effects remains mixed, with some studies suggesting that they facilitate trade by improving standards and market access, while others highlight their cost-increasing and trade-restrictive effects. In addition, most existing studies rely on aggregate trade data, leaving limited micro-level evidence on how behind-the-border NTMs affect producers, particularly commercial farmers in developing countries. Design/methodology/approach This study explores NTMs from both an extensive and intensive perspective using data from 455 commercial cereal farmers across five regions in Ghana. Employing ordinary least squares regression and instrumental variable (IV) techniques, the analysis assesses the association between NTMs, agricultural transaction costs and farm profitability. Findings The results reveal that customs formalities are the most frequently encountered NTMs. Commercial farmers who incurred NTMs conducted approximately 2.7 more cereal transactions per production season and faced an increase in compliance costs of GHS 2,533 (USD 346) per production season. In contrast, NTMs were associated with a reduction in produce perishability by 0.27 per production season and a decrease in profit of GHS 1,696 (USD 232) per production season. These outcomes persist even after controlling for potential endogeneity. The findings underscore that while NTMs may facilitate trade volume, they also raise compliance costs and reduce profitability, potentially constraining sustainable cereal production. Research limitations/implications The use of cross-sectional data limits our ability to fully establish causality. Future research could benefit from using panel data to explore the dynamic effects of NTMs to improve the depth of findings. Additionally, combining survey-based measures of compliance costs with official NTM data from sources such as the UNCTAD database could provide a more comprehensive understanding of how NTMs affect both domestic producers and international trade flows. Originality/value While most studies on non-tariff measures in developing countries focus on the macroeconomic level, this study examines the behind-the-border (i.e. within domestic markets) non-tariff measures that commercial farmers face, offering insights from a microeconomic perspective on their effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jadee-04-2025-0146
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behind-the-border non-tariff measures, agricultural transaction costs and profitability of commercial cereal farmers in Ghana

Yaw Osei-Asare, Abigail Ampomah Adaku, Edward Martey, Mustapha M. Suraj et al.
Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies
Global trade and economics
article

Behind-the-border non-tariff measures, agricultural transaction costs and profitability of commercial cereal farmers in Ghana

Yaw Osei-Asare, Abigail Ampomah Adaku, Edward Martey, Mustapha M. Suraj, Edward Ebo Onumah
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how behind-the-border non-tariff measures (NTMs) affect the agricultural transaction costs and profitability of commercial cereal farmers in Ghana. Despite the growing importance of NTMs in international trade, empirical evidence on their effects remains mixed, with some studies suggesting that they facilitate trade by improving standards and market access, while others highlight their cost-increasing and trade-restrictive effects. In addition, most existing studies rely on aggregate trade data, leaving limited micro-level evidence on how behind-the-border NTMs affect producers, particularly commercial farmers in developing countries. Design/methodology/approach This study explores NTMs from both an extensive and intensive perspective using data from 455 commercial cereal farmers across five regions in Ghana. Employing ordinary least squares regression and instrumental variable (IV) techniques, the analysis assesses the association between NTMs, agricultural transaction costs and farm profitability. Findings The results reveal that customs formalities are the most frequently encountered NTMs. Commercial farmers who incurred NTMs conducted approximately 2.7 more cereal transactions per production season and faced an increase in compliance costs of GHS 2,533 (USD 346) per production season. In contrast, NTMs were associated with a reduction in produce perishability by 0.27 per production season and a decrease in profit of GHS 1,696 (USD 232) per production season. These outcomes persist even after controlling for potential endogeneity. The findings underscore that while NTMs may facilitate trade volume, they also raise compliance costs and reduce profitability, potentially constraining sustainable cereal production. Research limitations/implications The use of cross-sectional data limits our ability to fully establish causality. Future research could benefit from using panel data to explore the dynamic effects of NTMs to improve the depth of findings. Additionally, combining survey-based measures of compliance costs with official NTM data from sources such as the UNCTAD database could provide a more comprehensive understanding of how NTMs affect both domestic producers and international trade flows. Originality/value While most studies on non-tariff measures in developing countries focus on the macroeconomic level, this study examines the behind-the-border (i.e. within domestic markets) non-tariff measures that commercial farmers face, offering insights from a microeconomic perspective on their effects.

Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies
Agricultural Institute (HU), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.