<b>Cross-device consistency in diabetic retinopathy grading: a comparative analysis of widefield versus standard 30–35</b> ° <b>– the ClarusDR study</b>

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) 7-field protocol remains the reference standard for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity grading, but is technically demanding, poorly tolerated and covers only 30-35% of the retina. Ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging systems, including Clarus and Optos, provide 200° retinal coverage with fewer acquisitions. This study evaluated agreement between ETDRS and UWF-based grading in non-proliferative DR. METHODS: In this prospective study (NCT05746975), 81 type 2 diabetes participants (147 eyes) with ETDRS-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) levels 35-47 underwent ETDRS 7-field colour fundus photography (CFP) and UWF imaging using Clarus 500 and Optos California. ETDRS grids were superimposed on UWF images. Two masked graders assigned DRSS levels using three strategies: ETDRS 7-field alone, periphery-only and extended (ETDRS plus periphery). Agreement was assessed and peripheral lesions were analysed for frequency and association with DR severity. RESULTS: Compared with ETDRS 7-field CFP, Clarus and Optos showed strong agreement in DR severity grading (Gwet's AC=0.774 and 0.809, respectively). Agreement was slightly lower for CFP-Clarus than CFP-Optos, reflecting higher detection sensitivity with Clarus, particularly for intraretinal microvascular abnormality and haemorrhages. Peripheral lesions were frequent and when combined with ETDRS fields identified eyes with more advanced disease. CONCLUSION: The peripheral retina alone does not show increased lesion severity, but extended UWF imaging integrating central and peripheral fields provides a more complete assessment. Extended Clarus and Optos imaging closely align with ETDRS grading while detecting additional severe cases, supporting UWF imaging as an alternative to ETDRS photography in clinical trials and practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05746975.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-329382
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-device consistency in diabetic retinopathy grading: a comparative analysis of widefield versus standard 30–35 ° – the ClarusDR study

Inês Marques, Ana Cláudia Rocha, Débora Reste‐Ferreira, José Cunha‐Vaz et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Cross-device consistency in diabetic retinopathy grading: a comparative analysis of widefield versus standard 30–35 ° – the ClarusDR study

Inês Marques, Ana Cláudia Rocha, Débora Reste‐Ferreira, José Cunha‐Vaz, Torcato Santos, Ana Rita Santos, Ana Paula de Almeida, Marta Lopes, Inês Pinto
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) 7-field protocol remains the reference standard for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity grading, but is technically demanding, poorly tolerated and covers only 30-35% of the retina. Ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging systems, including Clarus and Optos, provide 200° retinal coverage with fewer acquisitions. This study evaluated agreement between ETDRS and UWF-based grading in non-proliferative DR. METHODS: In this prospective study (NCT05746975), 81 type 2 diabetes participants (147 eyes) with ETDRS-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) levels 35-47 underwent ETDRS 7-field colour fundus photography (CFP) and UWF imaging using Clarus 500 and Optos California. ETDRS grids were superimposed on UWF images. Two masked graders assigned DRSS levels using three strategies: ETDRS 7-field alone, periphery-only and extended (ETDRS plus periphery). Agreement was assessed and peripheral lesions were analysed for frequency and association with DR severity. RESULTS: Compared with ETDRS 7-field CFP, Clarus and Optos showed strong agreement in DR severity grading (Gwet's AC=0.774 and 0.809, respectively). Agreement was slightly lower for CFP-Clarus than CFP-Optos, reflecting higher detection sensitivity with Clarus, particularly for intraretinal microvascular abnormality and haemorrhages. Peripheral lesions were frequent and when combined with ETDRS fields identified eyes with more advanced disease. CONCLUSION: The peripheral retina alone does not show increased lesion severity, but extended UWF imaging integrating central and peripheral fields provides a more complete assessment. Extended Clarus and Optos imaging closely align with ETDRS grading while detecting additional severe cases, supporting UWF imaging as an alternative to ETDRS photography in clinical trials and practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05746975.

British Journal of Ophthalmology
Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (PT), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.