Calorie‐Free Menus as a Potential Mitigation Strategy for Mandatory Calorie Labelling: Evidence From People With Disordered Eating in England

OBJECTIVE: Since the introduction of mandatory out-of-home calorie labelling in England, concerns have been raised about potential negative impacts on people with disordered eating. To mitigate these concerns, food outlets can provide calorie-free menus on request. However, no research has explored their use or impact among people with disordered eating. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study on the wider impacts of calorie labelling among 1001 people aged ≥ 16 years in England with lived experience of disordered eating. Of these, 969 completed questions about calorie-free menus. In-depth quantitative analyses focused on 644 participants who reported negative impact of calorie labels (i.e., those who may benefit from calorie-free menus). RESULTS: Most people did not request calorie-free menus (63.88%), including those that reported negative impacts (53.57%). People with higher clinical impairment, current compensatory behaviours, current comorbid disorder, and a history of eating disorder treatment were more likely to use calorie-free menus. Qualitative analyses highlighted both practical barriers and social discomfort when accessing calorie-free menus. Those who did use calorie-free menus reported positive experiences. CONCLUSIONS: People with disordered eating may benefit from accessing calorie-free menus. Addressing practical and social barriers may improve eating experiences of people with disordered eating in the out-of-home sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Eating Disorders Review
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.70151
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calorie‐Free Menus as a Potential Mitigation Strategy for Mandatory Calorie Labelling: Evidence From People With Disordered Eating in England

Ulrike Schmidt, Fiona Duffy, Tom Jewell, Dasha Nicholls et al.
European Eating Disorders Review
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Calorie‐Free Menus as a Potential Mitigation Strategy for Mandatory Calorie Labelling: Evidence From People With Disordered Eating in England

Ulrike Schmidt, Fiona Duffy, Tom Jewell, Dasha Nicholls, Nora Trompeter, Helen Sharpe, Lucy Serpell, Abinaya Nadarajah, Ellen Maloney
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since the introduction of mandatory out-of-home calorie labelling in England, concerns have been raised about potential negative impacts on people with disordered eating. To mitigate these concerns, food outlets can provide calorie-free menus on request. However, no research has explored their use or impact among people with disordered eating. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study on the wider impacts of calorie labelling among 1001 people aged ≥ 16 years in England with lived experience of disordered eating. Of these, 969 completed questions about calorie-free menus. In-depth quantitative analyses focused on 644 participants who reported negative impact of calorie labels (i.e., those who may benefit from calorie-free menus). RESULTS: Most people did not request calorie-free menus (63.88%), including those that reported negative impacts (53.57%). People with higher clinical impairment, current compensatory behaviours, current comorbid disorder, and a history of eating disorder treatment were more likely to use calorie-free menus. Qualitative analyses highlighted both practical barriers and social discomfort when accessing calorie-free menus. Those who did use calorie-free menus reported positive experiences. CONCLUSIONS: People with disordered eating may benefit from accessing calorie-free menus. Addressing practical and social barriers may improve eating experiences of people with disordered eating in the out-of-home sector.

European Eating Disorders Review
Department of Health and Social Care (GB), NHS Lothian (GB), King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Florence Nightingale Foundation (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.