AI as a clinical decision support system: accuracy of an open GPT-model in emergency practice

Abstract Background Up to 30% of imaging examinations are deemed inappropriate, leading to unnecessary radiation exposure, emergency department (ED) overcrowding, and rising healthcare costs. While clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) such as ESR iGuide aim to improve imaging appropriateness, their clinical impact and user adoption remain limited. Large language models (LLMs) may offer a faster, more accessible alternative for radiologic decision-making. Purpose To evaluate the performance of OpenAccessGPT in reducing inappropriate radiological examinations requested from an ED by comparing its recommendations with ESR iGuide and assessing appropriateness and time efficiency. Materials and methods This retrospective, single-center, semi-quantitative cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Switzerland. A total of 201 consecutive ED radiology requests (March 2023–April 2024) met inclusion criteria (50 CT, 50 US, 50 X-rays, 51 MRI). Four hypotheses were tested: (1) OpenAccessGPT’s ability to reduce imaging requests; (2) concordance with ESR iGuide; (3) time efficiency; and (4) the rate of inappropriate examinations in clinical practice when confronted to ESR iGuide. Statistical analyses included proportion tests and paired t-tests ( p < .05). Results Mean patient age was 55.3 years (SD = 20.9); 45% were female. Eleven cases were excluded due to unavailable ESR iGuide scenarios. OpenAccessGPT advised against imaging in 6% of cases (12/201), with 33.3% agreement with ESR iGuide (5/12). Overall concordance was 78.9% (150/190), below the 90% threshold (χ² = 25.79, p < .001). GPT was significantly faster (21.6 s vs. 101 s; Δ = 79.6 s; t[189] = 12.8; p < .001). Institutional practice aligned with ESR iGuide in 82.6% of cases (χ² = 11.46, p < .001). Conclusion OpenAccessGPT showed only limited ability to reduce inappropriate imaging. Despite substantial faster response times, its clinical reliability remained insufficient for standalone use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44326-026-00114-0
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI as a clinical decision support system: accuracy of an open GPT-model in emergency practice

Harriet C. Thoeny, Lucien Widmer, Vincent Grek, Jérémie Arthaud
Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI as a clinical decision support system: accuracy of an open GPT-model in emergency practice

Harriet C. Thoeny, Lucien Widmer, Vincent Grek, Jérémie Arthaud
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Up to 30% of imaging examinations are deemed inappropriate, leading to unnecessary radiation exposure, emergency department (ED) overcrowding, and rising healthcare costs. While clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) such as ESR iGuide aim to improve imaging appropriateness, their clinical impact and user adoption remain limited. Large language models (LLMs) may offer a faster, more accessible alternative for radiologic decision-making. Purpose To evaluate the performance of OpenAccessGPT in reducing inappropriate radiological examinations requested from an ED by comparing its recommendations with ESR iGuide and assessing appropriateness and time efficiency. Materials and methods This retrospective, single-center, semi-quantitative cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Switzerland. A total of 201 consecutive ED radiology requests (March 2023–April 2024) met inclusion criteria (50 CT, 50 US, 50 X-rays, 51 MRI). Four hypotheses were tested: (1) OpenAccessGPT’s ability to reduce imaging requests; (2) concordance with ESR iGuide; (3) time efficiency; and (4) the rate of inappropriate examinations in clinical practice when confronted to ESR iGuide. Statistical analyses included proportion tests and paired t-tests ( p < .05). Results Mean patient age was 55.3 years (SD = 20.9); 45% were female. Eleven cases were excluded due to unavailable ESR iGuide scenarios. OpenAccessGPT advised against imaging in 6% of cases (12/201), with 33.3% agreement with ESR iGuide (5/12). Overall concordance was 78.9% (150/190), below the 90% threshold (χ² = 25.79, p < .001). GPT was significantly faster (21.6 s vs. 101 s; Δ = 79.6 s; t[189] = 12.8; p < .001). Institutional practice aligned with ESR iGuide in 82.6% of cases (χ² = 11.46, p < .001). Conclusion OpenAccessGPT showed only limited ability to reduce inappropriate imaging. Despite substantial faster response times, its clinical reliability remained insufficient for standalone use.

Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology
University of Fribourg (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Fribourg Development Agency (CH)
Université de Fribourg
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.