Challenges and catalysators in building a robotic HPB program: the experience of a tertiary cancer center

Successful implementation of a robotic hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) program requires multiple elements and resources. Robotic HPB surgery has been performed at our center for over 15 years. We discuss the impact of different factors on our robotic HPB program's development. Adult patients undergoing the following procedures between 2009 and 2022 were identified: pancreatectomy, hepatectomy and hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) placement. A total of 573 procedures were included; distal pancreatectomy (26.8%), HAIP placement (27.2%), hepatectomy (39.4%) and pancreatoduodenectomy (6.5%). Three phases in the program's evolution were recognized; Initial Experience (2009-2014), Stabilization (2015-2019) and Expansion (2020-2022). During the latter, a total of 280 (48%) robotic HPB procedures were performed, increasing the average number of procedures per year from 27 to 93. There was a non significant increase in major complications with program evolution (13.3%, 22.8%, 22.3%, p = 0.08). A critical mass of surgeons and creating a learning ecosystem played a significant role in the program's evolution, along with the support of other experienced HPB surgeons, dedicated OR personnel, technological advances and expanding surgical indications. These elements should be considered when planning and building a robotic HPB program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Updates in Surgery
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02727-2
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and catalysators in building a robotic HPB program: the experience of a tertiary cancer center

Moran Slavin, Jarnagin Wr, M I D'Angelica, M Gonen et al.
Updates in Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Challenges and catalysators in building a robotic HPB program: the experience of a tertiary cancer center

Moran Slavin, Jarnagin Wr, M I D'Angelica, M Gonen, T. Peter Kingham, Alice C. Wei, Kevin C. Soares
article en

Abstract

Successful implementation of a robotic hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) program requires multiple elements and resources. Robotic HPB surgery has been performed at our center for over 15 years. We discuss the impact of different factors on our robotic HPB program's development. Adult patients undergoing the following procedures between 2009 and 2022 were identified: pancreatectomy, hepatectomy and hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) placement. A total of 573 procedures were included; distal pancreatectomy (26.8%), HAIP placement (27.2%), hepatectomy (39.4%) and pancreatoduodenectomy (6.5%). Three phases in the program's evolution were recognized; Initial Experience (2009-2014), Stabilization (2015-2019) and Expansion (2020-2022). During the latter, a total of 280 (48%) robotic HPB procedures were performed, increasing the average number of procedures per year from 27 to 93. There was a non significant increase in major complications with program evolution (13.3%, 22.8%, 22.3%, p = 0.08). A critical mass of surgeons and creating a learning ecosystem played a significant role in the program's evolution, along with the support of other experienced HPB surgeons, dedicated OR personnel, technological advances and expanding surgical indications. These elements should be considered when planning and building a robotic HPB program.

Updates in Surgery
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenges and catalysators in building a robotic HPB program: the experience of a tertiary cancer center — Moran Slavin, Jarnagin Wr, et al. · Updates in Surgery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS