Feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative 3D surface scanning to assess femoral component alignment relative to the native distal femoral articular surface in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE: Intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) surface scanning is not routinely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but may allow real-time evaluation of the native joint surface anatomy, enabling intraoperative evaluation and potential adaptation of implant alignment. METHODS: In this experimental study, four unembalmed knee joints from post-mortem donors underwent computer tomography scanning to generate ground-truth 3D bone models. A handheld structured-light surface scanner was then used to capture the 3D structure of the distal femur and the patella at different stages during TKA. Fiducial markers were used to compare registration accuracy between a marker-based and an anatomical landmark-based approach. Conformity between the native anatomy and the femoral component was numerically quantified. Simulated variations of the implant positioning were compared with the initial position. RESULTS: Scanning took 40-60 s per scan; the resulting point cloud was utilized to create a 3D model in 3 min on average, capturing anatomic details with an accuracy of ~0.2 mm. Aligning scans based on bony landmarks was more accurate compared to marker-based registration. Surface conformity comparisons between the femoral component and the native anatomy demonstrated consistent agreement at the distal and posterior condyles, whereas greater deviations were observed in the trochlear region. Simulated sagittal and mediolateral adjustments of the implant orientation were associated with measurable changes in trochlea surface conformity. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the technical feasibility of intraoperative structured-light 3D surface scanning for the analysis of femoral and patellar surface geometry, allowing for quantitative assessment of femoral component orientation relative to the native anatomy in a controlled experimental setting. The use of 3D scanning hardware may allow for faster acquisition of high-resolution surface data, compared to conventional imaging techniques. The small sample size and absence of in vivo validation limit the scope of the findings, requiring further studies to evaluate clinical application. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, experimental feasibility study based on post-mortem studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70542
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative 3D surface scanning to assess femoral component alignment relative to the native distal femoral articular surface in total knee arthroplasty

Niels Hammer, Björn Rath, T.S. Huber, Johannes Beckmann et al.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative 3D surface scanning to assess femoral component alignment relative to the native distal femoral articular surface in total knee arthroplasty

Niels Hammer, Björn Rath, T.S. Huber, Johannes Beckmann, Michael Tobias Hirschmann, David Ullmann, Martin Kamper
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) surface scanning is not routinely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but may allow real-time evaluation of the native joint surface anatomy, enabling intraoperative evaluation and potential adaptation of implant alignment. METHODS: In this experimental study, four unembalmed knee joints from post-mortem donors underwent computer tomography scanning to generate ground-truth 3D bone models. A handheld structured-light surface scanner was then used to capture the 3D structure of the distal femur and the patella at different stages during TKA. Fiducial markers were used to compare registration accuracy between a marker-based and an anatomical landmark-based approach. Conformity between the native anatomy and the femoral component was numerically quantified. Simulated variations of the implant positioning were compared with the initial position. RESULTS: Scanning took 40-60 s per scan; the resulting point cloud was utilized to create a 3D model in 3 min on average, capturing anatomic details with an accuracy of ~0.2 mm. Aligning scans based on bony landmarks was more accurate compared to marker-based registration. Surface conformity comparisons between the femoral component and the native anatomy demonstrated consistent agreement at the distal and posterior condyles, whereas greater deviations were observed in the trochlear region. Simulated sagittal and mediolateral adjustments of the implant orientation were associated with measurable changes in trochlea surface conformity. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the technical feasibility of intraoperative structured-light 3D surface scanning for the analysis of femoral and patellar surface geometry, allowing for quantitative assessment of femoral component orientation relative to the native anatomy in a controlled experimental setting. The use of 3D scanning hardware may allow for faster acquisition of high-resolution surface data, compared to conventional imaging techniques. The small sample size and absence of in vivo validation limit the scope of the findings, requiring further studies to evaluate clinical application. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, experimental feasibility study based on post-mortem studies.

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
University of Basel (CH), Medical University of Graz (AT), Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen (AT), Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (DE), Kantonsspital Baselland Standort Bruderholz (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.