Statistical Evaluation of a Foreshock Transient Model Using Ground‐Based ULF Wave Observations

Abstract Hot flow anomalies and foreshock bubbles are discontinuity–driven foreshock transients that generate significant geospace disturbances. A recently developed analytical model can predict their upstream perturbations. In this study, we further evaluate this model by comparing its predictions with geomagnetic disturbances measured by ground‐based magnetometers. We find that the model‐predicted foreshock ion‐driven current density, a measure of the foreshock transient's strength, correlates well with ground‐based magnetic wave power in the Pc3 band, with correlation coefficients reaching ∼0.55–0.6. This degree of correlation outperforms that derived by using locally measured upstream wave power or simple combinations of foreshock ion parameters in place of current density, indicating the model's effectiveness. The correlation coefficient's dependence on magnetic local time and ground station latitude may suggest the azimuthal and radial propagation of transient‐driven disturbances. Additionally, the model limitations are discussed. These results demonstrate the model's capability to forecast geospace disturbances driven by foreshock transients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl124981
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Evaluation of a Foreshock Transient Model Using Ground‐Based ULF Wave Observations

Y. D. Jia, Terry Z. Liu, Hui Zhang, Siqi Zhao et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Statistical Evaluation of a Foreshock Transient Model Using Ground‐Based ULF Wave Observations

Y. D. Jia, Terry Z. Liu, Hui Zhang, Siqi Zhao, V Angelopoulos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hot flow anomalies and foreshock bubbles are discontinuity–driven foreshock transients that generate significant geospace disturbances. A recently developed analytical model can predict their upstream perturbations. In this study, we further evaluate this model by comparing its predictions with geomagnetic disturbances measured by ground‐based magnetometers. We find that the model‐predicted foreshock ion‐driven current density, a measure of the foreshock transient's strength, correlates well with ground‐based magnetic wave power in the Pc3 band, with correlation coefficients reaching ∼0.55–0.6. This degree of correlation outperforms that derived by using locally measured upstream wave power or simple combinations of foreshock ion parameters in place of current density, indicating the model's effectiveness. The correlation coefficient's dependence on magnetic local time and ground station latitude may suggest the azimuthal and radial propagation of transient‐driven disturbances. Additionally, the model limitations are discussed. These results demonstrate the model's capability to forecast geospace disturbances driven by foreshock transients.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(14)
Planetary Science Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Potsdam (DE), China Academy of Space Technology (CN), Institute of Space Sciences (ES)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Statistical Evaluation of a Foreshock Transient Model Using Ground‐Based ULF Wave Observations — Y. D. Jia, Terry Z. Liu, et al. · Geophysical Research Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS