Interlaboratory evaluation of experimental setups for textile reinforcements

Abstract Reliable test methods that provide reproducible results are essential for the mechanical characterisation and standardisation of textile reinforced concrete (TRC). This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory study comprising uniaxial tensile tests and bond tests on TRC with various textile configurations. All laboratories conducted the experiments in accordance with predefined test protocols. The results were statistically evaluated with respect to scatter, repeatability, reproducibility and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The uniaxial tensile test exhibited low interlaboratory scatter and a uniform mechanical response across all participants. Both the qualitative behaviour and the derived characteristic values showed close agreement, indicating that the applied procedure enables reproducible characterisation under controlled conditions. In contrast, the bond test revealed a higher level of scatter. This increased variability is attributed primarily to the greater sensitivity of the test arrangement and the inherent complexity of the bond interaction, rather than to systematic laboratory-dependent influences. Despite the larger numerical variability, the overall response characteristics were consistent across laboratories, demonstrating that the governing bond mechanisms were captured in a comparable manner. The results underline the need to combine quantitative evaluation with qualitative assessment when interpreting bond test data, providing a basis for further refinement and potential standardisation of the applied test methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials and Structures
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-026-03196-0
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interlaboratory evaluation of experimental setups for textile reinforcements

Philipp Preinstorfer, Jürgen Feix, Pegah Zare, Norbert Randl et al.
Materials and Structures
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Interlaboratory evaluation of experimental setups for textile reinforcements

Philipp Preinstorfer, Jürgen Feix, Pegah Zare, Norbert Randl, Mathias Hammerl, Julian Konzilia, Jonas De Wachter, Lazar Azdejkovic
article en

Abstract

Abstract Reliable test methods that provide reproducible results are essential for the mechanical characterisation and standardisation of textile reinforced concrete (TRC). This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory study comprising uniaxial tensile tests and bond tests on TRC with various textile configurations. All laboratories conducted the experiments in accordance with predefined test protocols. The results were statistically evaluated with respect to scatter, repeatability, reproducibility and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The uniaxial tensile test exhibited low interlaboratory scatter and a uniform mechanical response across all participants. Both the qualitative behaviour and the derived characteristic values showed close agreement, indicating that the applied procedure enables reproducible characterisation under controlled conditions. In contrast, the bond test revealed a higher level of scatter. This increased variability is attributed primarily to the greater sensitivity of the test arrangement and the inherent complexity of the bond interaction, rather than to systematic laboratory-dependent influences. Despite the larger numerical variability, the overall response characteristics were consistent across laboratories, demonstrating that the governing bond mechanisms were captured in a comparable manner. The results underline the need to combine quantitative evaluation with qualitative assessment when interpreting bond test data, providing a basis for further refinement and potential standardisation of the applied test methods.

Materials and StructuresVol. 59(7)
TU Wien (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol (AT), FH Kärnten (AT), BOKU University (AT)
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.