Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Beyond Practical Implications on the WTO’s Fragmentation

This article examines the current crisis of multilateralism amid escalating geopolitical tensions, technological disruption, and the fragmentation of global governance, with a particular focus on the World Trade Organization (WTO). It argues that the paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body (AB) represents not merely an institutional malfunction but a systemic shift away from rule-based multilateralism toward power-based and fragmented arrangements. The analysis situates this development within a broader transformation of the international order characterized by flexible alliances, increased reliance on plurilateral agreements, and diminishing consensus-based decision-making. It further underscores the growing importance of political risk assessment in strategic decision-making as global rules lose enforceability. Drawing on recent examples – including Peru-s experience in the WTO’s fisheries subsidies and e-commerce negotiations – the article concludes that restoring effective multilateralism requires institutional adaptation, flexible negotiation frameworks, searching alternatives to consensus and renewed political commitment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2026052
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Beyond Practical Implications on the WTO’s Fragmentation

Luis E. Mayaute Vargas
Global Trade and Customs Journal
World Trade Organization Law
article

Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Beyond Practical Implications on the WTO’s Fragmentation

Luis E. Mayaute Vargas
article en

Abstract

This article examines the current crisis of multilateralism amid escalating geopolitical tensions, technological disruption, and the fragmentation of global governance, with a particular focus on the World Trade Organization (WTO). It argues that the paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body (AB) represents not merely an institutional malfunction but a systemic shift away from rule-based multilateralism toward power-based and fragmented arrangements. The analysis situates this development within a broader transformation of the international order characterized by flexible alliances, increased reliance on plurilateral agreements, and diminishing consensus-based decision-making. It further underscores the growing importance of political risk assessment in strategic decision-making as global rules lose enforceability. Drawing on recent examples – including Peru-s experience in the WTO’s fisheries subsidies and e-commerce negotiations – the article concludes that restoring effective multilateralism requires institutional adaptation, flexible negotiation frameworks, searching alternatives to consensus and renewed political commitment.

Global Trade and Customs JournalVol. 21(Issue 9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.