DEGA: A Deterministic Diagnostic Evidence Governance Agent for Industrial IoT—A DUDU-BLDC Case Study

Industrial diagnostic systems increasingly combine machine-learning classifiers, temporal models, uncertainty surrogates, and explanation methods. Their operational use requires a separate mechanism that determines whether the available evidence is valid, mutually consistent, sufficient for a recommendation, or should instead lead to abstention or human escalation. This paper introduces the Diagnostic Evidence Governance Agent (DEGA), a deterministic agent that separates evidence generation from workflow governance. DEGA operates on immutable evidence objects, follows an explicit finite-state workflow, applies a higher-priority SafetyGuard, and records a hash-linked audit trace supporting deterministic replay. The architecture is demonstrated in an offline case study using eight DUDU-BLDC acquisitions, 200 non-overlapping windows, 28 current- and speed-based features, three classifiers, and four spline representations. Across 16 dependent acquisition-disjoint assignment views, mean acquisition-level macro-F1 was 0.875 for Logistic Regression and 0.667 for both tree-based classifiers. The pipeline produced 768 complete EvidenceBundles with reproducible scientific hashes. Explanation rankings were assignment-sensitive, with a mean top-10 Jaccard similarity of 0.318. Twelve representative DEGA executions ended in three escalations and nine no-decision outcomes, with complete audit chains and deterministic replay. The study demonstrates auditable, fail-closed governance of AI-supported diagnostic evidence without delegating workflow control to an AI agent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17080795
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DEGA: A Deterministic Diagnostic Evidence Governance Agent for Industrial IoT—A DUDU-BLDC Case Study

Jerzy Baranowski, Waldemar Bauer, Kacper Jarzyna, Agnieszka Piątek et al.
Information
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

DEGA: A Deterministic Diagnostic Evidence Governance Agent for Industrial IoT—A DUDU-BLDC Case Study

Jerzy Baranowski, Waldemar Bauer, Kacper Jarzyna, Agnieszka Piątek, Miłosz Ziemba
article en

Abstract

Industrial diagnostic systems increasingly combine machine-learning classifiers, temporal models, uncertainty surrogates, and explanation methods. Their operational use requires a separate mechanism that determines whether the available evidence is valid, mutually consistent, sufficient for a recommendation, or should instead lead to abstention or human escalation. This paper introduces the Diagnostic Evidence Governance Agent (DEGA), a deterministic agent that separates evidence generation from workflow governance. DEGA operates on immutable evidence objects, follows an explicit finite-state workflow, applies a higher-priority SafetyGuard, and records a hash-linked audit trace supporting deterministic replay. The architecture is demonstrated in an offline case study using eight DUDU-BLDC acquisitions, 200 non-overlapping windows, 28 current- and speed-based features, three classifiers, and four spline representations. Across 16 dependent acquisition-disjoint assignment views, mean acquisition-level macro-F1 was 0.875 for Logistic Regression and 0.667 for both tree-based classifiers. The pipeline produced 768 complete EvidenceBundles with reproducible scientific hashes. Explanation rankings were assignment-sensitive, with a mean top-10 Jaccard similarity of 0.318. Twelve representative DEGA executions ended in three escalations and nine no-decision outcomes, with complete audit chains and deterministic replay. The study demonstrates auditable, fail-closed governance of AI-supported diagnostic evidence without delegating workflow control to an AI agent.

InformationVol. 17(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.