IV Thrombolysis in the Extended Time Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, yet many patients present beyond this window. Recent randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and updated guidelines suggest potential benefit of IVT in selected patients treated in the extended time window, but the overall evidence remains evolving. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT beyond 4.5 hours from last known well. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs and individual patient data meta-analyses of RCTs comparing IVT plus best medical therapy (BMT) with BMT alone in patients with AIS presenting more than 4.5 hours after last known well. The primary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1). Secondary efficacy outcomes included good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) and reduced disability (≥1-point shift across the mRS). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH); secondary safety outcomes were any ICH and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed according to thrombolytic agent, treatment window, imaging selection strategy, vascular territory, and administration of endovascular treatment. Trial sequential analysis was conducted for the primary outcome to evaluate the robustness of the cumulative evidence. RESULTS: = 0%; NNH = 75). The rates of any ICH and all-cause mortality were similar between the 2 groups. No significant subgroup differences were documented across different subgroups. Trial sequential analysis confirmed that the cumulative evidence for the primary outcome crossed the efficacy boundary, supporting a robust treatment effect. DISCUSSION: IVT in the extended time window was associated with improved functional outcomes without increased mortality, supporting its use in selected patients despite a higher rate of sICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The prespecified protocol of the present systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (registration ID: CRD420261330511).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000218294
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IV Thrombolysis in the Extended Time Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Urs Fischer, Maria‐Ioanna Stefanou, Georgios K. Tsivgoulis, Robin Lemmens et al.
1 citations
Neurology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
8.05
article

IV Thrombolysis in the Extended Time Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Urs Fischer, Maria‐Ioanna Stefanou, Georgios K. Tsivgoulis, Robin Lemmens, Aikaterini Theodorou, Michele Romoli, Lina Palaiodimou, Guillaume Turc, Nikolaos M. Papageorgiou, Andrei V. Alexandrov, Amrou Sarraj
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, yet many patients present beyond this window. Recent randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and updated guidelines suggest potential benefit of IVT in selected patients treated in the extended time window, but the overall evidence remains evolving. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT beyond 4.5 hours from last known well. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs and individual patient data meta-analyses of RCTs comparing IVT plus best medical therapy (BMT) with BMT alone in patients with AIS presenting more than 4.5 hours after last known well. The primary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1). Secondary efficacy outcomes included good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) and reduced disability (≥1-point shift across the mRS). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH); secondary safety outcomes were any ICH and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed according to thrombolytic agent, treatment window, imaging selection strategy, vascular territory, and administration of endovascular treatment. Trial sequential analysis was conducted for the primary outcome to evaluate the robustness of the cumulative evidence. RESULTS: = 0%; NNH = 75). The rates of any ICH and all-cause mortality were similar between the 2 groups. No significant subgroup differences were documented across different subgroups. Trial sequential analysis confirmed that the cumulative evidence for the primary outcome crossed the efficacy boundary, supporting a robust treatment effect. DISCUSSION: IVT in the extended time window was associated with improved functional outcomes without increased mortality, supporting its use in selected patients despite a higher rate of sICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The prespecified protocol of the present systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (registration ID: CRD420261330511).

NeurologyVol. 107(3)
Inserm (FR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Université Paris Cité (FR), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Banner Health (US), Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix (US), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US), Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena (IT), Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (FR), University General Hospital Attikon (GR), FHU Neurovasc (FR), University of Tübingen (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
8.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.