The EvIDHence study: real-world treatment patterns and safety outcomes in mutant and wild-type IDH1 cholangiocarcinoma before availability of mIDH1 inhibitors

Background Treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are limited, with poor overall survival (OS). The impact of molecular alterations on clinical outcomes in real-world practice is poorly understood. Patients and Methods EvIDHence was a retrospective, descriptive, multicenter, international, chart review study investigating the natural disease course of patients with advanced/metastatic CCA who underwent mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (m IDH1 ) testing and initiated second-line treatment on or before 1 July 2019 until 31 December 2021, before commercial availability of mIDH1-targeted therapy. Outcomes included patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, biomarker testing and survival. Results Sixty-three patients with CCA (31 m IDH1 ; 32 IDH1 wild-type) were included. There were no differences in patient and disease characteristics between m IDH1 and IDH1 wild-type groups. Biomarker testing was carried out in the context of research/clinical trials in 61.9% of patients. The most frequent first- and second-line systemic regimens were gemcitabine plus cisplatin and FOLFOX, respectively. Median OS from first-line treatment initiation was 20.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-29.3] and 18.6 (95% CI 13.0-20.5) months for m IDH1 and IDH1 wild-type groups, respectively. Median OS from second-line treatment initiation was 9.7 (95% CI 5.5-11.2) and 8.5 (95% CI 6.5-11.3) months for patients with m IDH1 and IDH1 wild-type CCA, respectively. Conclusion These real-world data highlight the poor prognosis of patients with CCA, regardless of IDH1 mutational status. Limitations included the small sample size and biased selection of patients still fit for second-line therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100367
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The EvIDHence study: real-world treatment patterns and safety outcomes in mutant and wild-type IDH1 cholangiocarcinoma before availability of mIDH1 inhibitors

D. Melisi, Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli, D. Palmer, Lorenza Rimassa et al.
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

The EvIDHence study: real-world treatment patterns and safety outcomes in mutant and wild-type IDH1 cholangiocarcinoma before availability of mIDH1 inhibitors

D. Melisi, Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli, D. Palmer, Lorenza Rimassa, Juan W. Valle, Ángela Lamarca, N. Fares, Paula Cerdá, H. Gharbi, R. Robert, R.Pazo Cid, R. Vera, A. Hollebecque, Lukas Perkhofer, A. Casadei-Gardini, V. Manuel-Minguez, I. Ghanem, M. Javle, V. Sahai, I.G. Jimenez, M.A. Gonzalez-Carmona, J.-F. Blanc
article en

Abstract

Background Treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are limited, with poor overall survival (OS). The impact of molecular alterations on clinical outcomes in real-world practice is poorly understood. Patients and Methods EvIDHence was a retrospective, descriptive, multicenter, international, chart review study investigating the natural disease course of patients with advanced/metastatic CCA who underwent mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (m IDH1 ) testing and initiated second-line treatment on or before 1 July 2019 until 31 December 2021, before commercial availability of mIDH1-targeted therapy. Outcomes included patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, biomarker testing and survival. Results Sixty-three patients with CCA (31 m IDH1 ; 32 IDH1 wild-type) were included. There were no differences in patient and disease characteristics between m IDH1 and IDH1 wild-type groups. Biomarker testing was carried out in the context of research/clinical trials in 61.9% of patients. The most frequent first- and second-line systemic regimens were gemcitabine plus cisplatin and FOLFOX, respectively. Median OS from first-line treatment initiation was 20.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-29.3] and 18.6 (95% CI 13.0-20.5) months for m IDH1 and IDH1 wild-type groups, respectively. Median OS from second-line treatment initiation was 9.7 (95% CI 5.5-11.2) and 8.5 (95% CI 6.5-11.3) months for patients with m IDH1 and IDH1 wild-type CCA, respectively. Conclusion These real-world data highlight the poor prognosis of patients with CCA, regardless of IDH1 mutational status. Limitations included the small sample size and biased selection of patients still fit for second-line therapy.

ESMO Gastrointestinal OncologyVol. 13
Humanitas University (IT), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), University of Michigan (US), University Hospital Bonn (DE), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (ES), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Navarre Institute of Health Research (ES), Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet (ES), Navarrabiomed (ES), Hôpital Rangueil (FR), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), Servier (France) (FR), Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation (US), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), University Hospital Ulm (DE), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.