Towards a political ecology of Earth System Modelling

Earth system models (ESMs) have been presented as existentially-vital tools for guiding humanity through present and future crises. As part of a special issue, this review paper outlines what a political ecology of Earth System Science (ESS) might look like. We outline some of the political, economic, and ecological structures ESMs depend upon. We trace the disciplinary alternatives that ESS has displaced in its rise to authority, point towards new the state–corporate–military assemblages this authority rests upon, and exemplify the metabolic demands of its hyper scale computational infrastructures, in terms of energy, water, and minerals. In doing so, we argue that between the decommissioning of the Blue Waters (2013–2021) supercomputer and the commissioning of Solstice (2025–2026), a new political ecology of ESS became legible. ESS began to run on digital platforms operated by and for a set of Big Tech companies. Recognising the political and ecological consequences of this new political ecology, we argue ESS must confront its costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Anthropocene Review
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196261472819
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a political ecology of Earth System Modelling

Thomas Turnbull, Adam Wickberg
The Anthropocene Review
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Towards a political ecology of Earth System Modelling

Thomas Turnbull, Adam Wickberg
article en

Abstract

Earth system models (ESMs) have been presented as existentially-vital tools for guiding humanity through present and future crises. As part of a special issue, this review paper outlines what a political ecology of Earth System Science (ESS) might look like. We outline some of the political, economic, and ecological structures ESMs depend upon. We trace the disciplinary alternatives that ESS has displaced in its rise to authority, point towards new the state–corporate–military assemblages this authority rests upon, and exemplify the metabolic demands of its hyper scale computational infrastructures, in terms of energy, water, and minerals. In doing so, we argue that between the decommissioning of the Blue Waters (2013–2021) supercomputer and the commissioning of Solstice (2025–2026), a new political ecology of ESS became legible. ESS began to run on digital platforms operated by and for a set of Big Tech companies. Recognising the political and ecological consequences of this new political ecology, we argue ESS must confront its costs.

The Anthropocene Review
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (DE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.