Remarks on Sutherland, <i>Kant’s Mathematical World</i>

Abstract The main idea in Daniel Sutherland’s Kant’s Mathematical World is a strong claim about the immanence of mathematics in the world: Mathematics is literally true of objects of experience because it conditions the possibility of experience, and thereby the objects of experience. Sutherland grounds this claim on an insightful treatment of the general theory of magnitude that outlines constraints on magnitude’s representation. That representational task also gives rise to a regress problem, which Sutherland addresses by appeal to continuous successive synthesis. The result bears on recent debates between conceptualist and non-conceptualist readings of Kant’s theory of cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2026.10097
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remarks on Sutherland, Kant’s Mathematical World

R. Lanier Anderson
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Remarks on Sutherland, Kant’s Mathematical World

R. Lanier Anderson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The main idea in Daniel Sutherland’s Kant’s Mathematical World is a strong claim about the immanence of mathematics in the world: Mathematics is literally true of objects of experience because it conditions the possibility of experience, and thereby the objects of experience. Sutherland grounds this claim on an insightful treatment of the general theory of magnitude that outlines constraints on magnitude’s representation. That representational task also gives rise to a regress problem, which Sutherland addresses by appeal to continuous successive synthesis. The result bears on recent debates between conceptualist and non-conceptualist readings of Kant’s theory of cognition.

Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.