Agreement among common core temperature indices in defining critical environmental limits for human thermoregulation: A secondary analysis

Global intensification of heat extremes has heightened interest in defining critical environmental limits for human thermoregulation. These limits are commonly estimated from the inflection point in core temperature during progressive heat stress protocols. Esophageal temperature (T es ) is the criterion core temperature index, as it reflects right atrial blood temperature and responds rapidly to changes in the body’s thermal state. However, measurements of rectal (T re ) and gastrointestinal temperature (T gi ) are more commonly used due to better participant tolerability. We evaluated agreement between inflection points of these core temperature indices using data from two previously published progressive heat stress protocols. Study 1 measured T es and T re in 12 resting young adults (3 female). Study 2 evaluated T re and T gi in 16 resting or cycling young adults (8 females). Ambient conditions at the identified inflection points were converted to wet-bulb temperature (T wb ) and analyzed with Bland-Altman analysis (±1.3°C T wb acceptable agreement range). In Study 1, both the mean bias (0.3°C [95% CI: 0.0 to 0.6°C]) and the individual limits of agreement (LOA: −0.6 to 1.3°C) for the T es -T re comparison were within ±1.3 °C T wb . In Study 2, the mean bias was also within the acceptable range (0.8°C [0.5 to 1.1°C]), whereas the limits of agreement (0.6 to 1.7°C T wb ) exceeded this threshold. Although larger confirmatory trials are needed, these findings suggest that T re inflection identified during a progressive humidity protocol closely aligns with that identified using T es . While T re and T gi demonstrated acceptable group-level agreement, caution is warranted when interpreting individual responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00072.2026
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement among common core temperature indices in defining critical environmental limits for human thermoregulation: A secondary analysis

W. Larry Kenney, Robert D. Meade, Timo B. van den Bogaard, Glen Patrick Kenny et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Agreement among common core temperature indices in defining critical environmental limits for human thermoregulation: A secondary analysis

W. Larry Kenney, Robert D. Meade, Timo B. van den Bogaard, Glen Patrick Kenny, Fergus K. O’Connor, Olivia K. Leach, H.A.M. Daanen
article en

Abstract

Global intensification of heat extremes has heightened interest in defining critical environmental limits for human thermoregulation. These limits are commonly estimated from the inflection point in core temperature during progressive heat stress protocols. Esophageal temperature (T es ) is the criterion core temperature index, as it reflects right atrial blood temperature and responds rapidly to changes in the body’s thermal state. However, measurements of rectal (T re ) and gastrointestinal temperature (T gi ) are more commonly used due to better participant tolerability. We evaluated agreement between inflection points of these core temperature indices using data from two previously published progressive heat stress protocols. Study 1 measured T es and T re in 12 resting young adults (3 female). Study 2 evaluated T re and T gi in 16 resting or cycling young adults (8 females). Ambient conditions at the identified inflection points were converted to wet-bulb temperature (T wb ) and analyzed with Bland-Altman analysis (±1.3°C T wb acceptable agreement range). In Study 1, both the mean bias (0.3°C [95% CI: 0.0 to 0.6°C]) and the individual limits of agreement (LOA: −0.6 to 1.3°C) for the T es -T re comparison were within ±1.3 °C T wb . In Study 2, the mean bias was also within the acceptable range (0.8°C [0.5 to 1.1°C]), whereas the limits of agreement (0.6 to 1.7°C T wb ) exceeded this threshold. Although larger confirmatory trials are needed, these findings suggest that T re inflection identified during a progressive humidity protocol closely aligns with that identified using T es . While T re and T gi demonstrated acceptable group-level agreement, caution is warranted when interpreting individual responses.

American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Griffith University (AU), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Harvard University Press (US), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.