Combined Reinforcement of Rubber Aggregate Concrete with Ceramic Balls and Steel Fibers Under Dynamic Compression

Rubber aggregate concrete (RAC) offers excellent frost resistance and impact toughness, but the incorporation of rubber particles substantially reduces its compressive strength, limiting structural applications. Existing improvement strategies have mainly relied on a single modification route, whereas the dynamic compressive response of RAC containing both ceramic balls and steel fibers remains insufficiently clarified. Here, a ceramic ball–steel fiber rubber aggregate concrete (CBSFRC) was investigated using quasi-static compression, a Φ120 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar system, and high-speed photography. Three steel-fiber volume fractions (1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%) were tested. The CBSFRC waveform displayed a characteristic ‘low-first, high-second’ double-peak pattern, in contrast to the ‘high-first, low-second’ pattern of the reference rubber aggregate concrete (CRC). At the common interpolated strain rates of 40, 45, and 50 s−1, the dynamic compressive strengths of CBSFRC were 35.9–53.6% higher than those of CRC; no extrapolation was used. The largest quasi-static strength increase among the tested mixtures was 51.7%. The observed CBSFRC ultimate strains and strain energy densities ranged from 11.1–17.5 × 10−3 to 8.1–14.1 × 105 J/m3, respectively. Matched-rate analysis showed that the largest DIF increment was 18.8% for SF-1CBRC at 40 s−1, whereas the largest strain-energy-density increment was 70.2% for SF-1.5CBRC at 50 s−1. These results describe the tested range and do not establish a universal optimum steel-fiber content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142919
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined Reinforcement of Rubber Aggregate Concrete with Ceramic Balls and Steel Fibers Under Dynamic Compression

Kefo Qu, C E Wu, Aimei Yao, Yongjun Deng
Buildings
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
article

Combined Reinforcement of Rubber Aggregate Concrete with Ceramic Balls and Steel Fibers Under Dynamic Compression

Kefo Qu, C E Wu, Aimei Yao, Yongjun Deng
article en

Abstract

Rubber aggregate concrete (RAC) offers excellent frost resistance and impact toughness, but the incorporation of rubber particles substantially reduces its compressive strength, limiting structural applications. Existing improvement strategies have mainly relied on a single modification route, whereas the dynamic compressive response of RAC containing both ceramic balls and steel fibers remains insufficiently clarified. Here, a ceramic ball–steel fiber rubber aggregate concrete (CBSFRC) was investigated using quasi-static compression, a Φ120 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar system, and high-speed photography. Three steel-fiber volume fractions (1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%) were tested. The CBSFRC waveform displayed a characteristic ‘low-first, high-second’ double-peak pattern, in contrast to the ‘high-first, low-second’ pattern of the reference rubber aggregate concrete (CRC). At the common interpolated strain rates of 40, 45, and 50 s−1, the dynamic compressive strengths of CBSFRC were 35.9–53.6% higher than those of CRC; no extrapolation was used. The largest quasi-static strength increase among the tested mixtures was 51.7%. The observed CBSFRC ultimate strains and strain energy densities ranged from 11.1–17.5 × 10−3 to 8.1–14.1 × 105 J/m3, respectively. Matched-rate analysis showed that the largest DIF increment was 18.8% for SF-1CBRC at 40 s−1, whereas the largest strain-energy-density increment was 70.2% for SF-1.5CBRC at 50 s−1. These results describe the tested range and do not establish a universal optimum steel-fiber content.

BuildingsVol. 16(14)
Southwest University of Science and Technology (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.