Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density and associated morphological factors

In the analysis of 82 participants using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) images, side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density were 3.0%. Gluteal muscle volume and femoral anteversion asymmetry contributed to these discrepancies. Bilateral hip assessment may improve the detection of osteoporosis, particularly when QCT data are available. PURPOSE: Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density (BMD) are occasionally observed in clinical practice. However, the factors contributing to this asymmetry remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify differences in BMD between the right and left hips and identify morphological factors associated with these differences using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). METHODS: This prospective study included 82 adults (median age: 75 years) without a history of lower extremity disorders. Bilateral total hip BMD was calculated from the QCT data using a previously validated deep learning method. Side-to-side percentage differences were calculated. Participants with differences exceeding 5%, the least significant change recommended for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), were identified. Morphological variables, including gluteal muscle volume and femoral anteversion, were extracted bilaterally, and multivariate analyses were performed to examine their associations with BMD differences. RESULTS: The median side-to-side BMD difference was 3.0% (interquartile range: 1.6%-5.8%). In 26% of the participants, the BMD differences exceeded 5%. When bilateral data were used, the proportion of participants with T-scores ≤ - 2.5 increased by 2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that greater differences in gluteal muscle volume and femoral anteversion were independently associated with larger differences in BMD. Specifically, the side with smaller gluteal muscle volume and greater femoral anteversion exhibited lower BMD. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of older adults exhibited clinically relevant side-to-side differences in hip BMD. Given that unilateral DXA measurements may underestimate the risk of osteoporosis, bilateral hip assessment is recommended whenever possible, particularly when QCT images are available for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Osteoporosis International
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-026-08141-z
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density and associated morphological factors

Hirokazu Mae, Sotaro Kono, Kazuma Takashima, Mazen Soufi et al.
Osteoporosis International
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density and associated morphological factors

Hirokazu Mae, Sotaro Kono, Kazuma Takashima, Mazen Soufi, Keisuke Uemura, Tetsuro Tani, Yoshinobu Sato, Tomoki Asano, Hidetoshi Hamada, Ryo Higuchi, Seiji Okada, Yoshito Otake
article en

Abstract

In the analysis of 82 participants using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) images, side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density were 3.0%. Gluteal muscle volume and femoral anteversion asymmetry contributed to these discrepancies. Bilateral hip assessment may improve the detection of osteoporosis, particularly when QCT data are available. PURPOSE: Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density (BMD) are occasionally observed in clinical practice. However, the factors contributing to this asymmetry remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify differences in BMD between the right and left hips and identify morphological factors associated with these differences using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). METHODS: This prospective study included 82 adults (median age: 75 years) without a history of lower extremity disorders. Bilateral total hip BMD was calculated from the QCT data using a previously validated deep learning method. Side-to-side percentage differences were calculated. Participants with differences exceeding 5%, the least significant change recommended for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), were identified. Morphological variables, including gluteal muscle volume and femoral anteversion, were extracted bilaterally, and multivariate analyses were performed to examine their associations with BMD differences. RESULTS: The median side-to-side BMD difference was 3.0% (interquartile range: 1.6%-5.8%). In 26% of the participants, the BMD differences exceeded 5%. When bilateral data were used, the proportion of participants with T-scores ≤ - 2.5 increased by 2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that greater differences in gluteal muscle volume and femoral anteversion were independently associated with larger differences in BMD. Specifically, the side with smaller gluteal muscle volume and greater femoral anteversion exhibited lower BMD. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of older adults exhibited clinically relevant side-to-side differences in hip BMD. Given that unilateral DXA measurements may underestimate the risk of osteoporosis, bilateral hip assessment is recommended whenever possible, particularly when QCT images are available for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Osteoporosis International
Nara Medical University (JP), Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.