Hydraulic and Scour Assessment for Sustainable Bridge Replacement over the Mid Fork Saline River, USA

River crossing bridges in low-gradient floodplains can be affected by limited conveyance, backwater control, and scour-related foundation risk. This study evaluates a proposed IL 13 bridge replacement over the Mid Fork Saline River, Illinois, using HEC-RAS 1D steady-flow modeling, hydrologic inputs from USGS StreamStats for a drainage area of 236.45 mi2, bridge opening analysis, multiple-opening interpretation, and HEC-18 scour assessment. Natural, existing, and proposed conditions were compared under design floods and Ohio River tailwater scenarios. The proposed bridge increased the effective waterway opening under all evaluated hydraulic scenarios, with increases of approximately 68.5–79.5% under the no-tailwater case, 76.1–76.9% under the 10-year Ohio River tailwater case, and 71.7–72.1% under the 50-year Ohio River tailwater case. Bridge opening velocity decreased by about one-third, indicating lower local hydraulic intensity and improved conveyance through the main opening. Contraction scour was not controlling, while computed pier scour decreased by approximately 8–10% and the controlling right abutment scour decreased slightly. Because empirical HEC-18 scour equations can have large uncertainty, commonly approaching an order of a factor of two in practical scour prediction, these reductions are interpreted only as comparative trends. They do not provide a basis for reducing foundation design requirements, but they indicate that the proposed replacement does not worsen the controlling scour response. Overall, the replacement improves hydraulic compatibility, reduces local hydraulic stress, and does not worsen the governing scour response. The study supports SDG 9, SDG 11, and SDG 13 in a hydraulic-infrastructure sense by promoting resilient bridge serviceability, safer transport connectivity, and adaptation-oriented flood risk assessment; however, full life-cycle carbon, cost, and network-resilience metrics were outside the scope.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11070253
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydraulic and Scour Assessment for Sustainable Bridge Replacement over the Mid Fork Saline River, USA

Saif Al-Omari, Qusay Y. Abu-Afifeh, Ali Brezat, Nisreen Obeidat et al.
Infrastructures
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
article

Hydraulic and Scour Assessment for Sustainable Bridge Replacement over the Mid Fork Saline River, USA

Saif Al-Omari, Qusay Y. Abu-Afifeh, Ali Brezat, Nisreen Obeidat, Mutaz M. Zoubi, Haneen Darwish, Heba F. Al-Jawaldeh, Yazan A. Alta’any, Tariq M. F. Al-Nawaiseh, Rasha Ahmed Al-Rkebat, Ahmad J. Alzubaidi
article en

Abstract

River crossing bridges in low-gradient floodplains can be affected by limited conveyance, backwater control, and scour-related foundation risk. This study evaluates a proposed IL 13 bridge replacement over the Mid Fork Saline River, Illinois, using HEC-RAS 1D steady-flow modeling, hydrologic inputs from USGS StreamStats for a drainage area of 236.45 mi2, bridge opening analysis, multiple-opening interpretation, and HEC-18 scour assessment. Natural, existing, and proposed conditions were compared under design floods and Ohio River tailwater scenarios. The proposed bridge increased the effective waterway opening under all evaluated hydraulic scenarios, with increases of approximately 68.5–79.5% under the no-tailwater case, 76.1–76.9% under the 10-year Ohio River tailwater case, and 71.7–72.1% under the 50-year Ohio River tailwater case. Bridge opening velocity decreased by about one-third, indicating lower local hydraulic intensity and improved conveyance through the main opening. Contraction scour was not controlling, while computed pier scour decreased by approximately 8–10% and the controlling right abutment scour decreased slightly. Because empirical HEC-18 scour equations can have large uncertainty, commonly approaching an order of a factor of two in practical scour prediction, these reductions are interpreted only as comparative trends. They do not provide a basis for reducing foundation design requirements, but they indicate that the proposed replacement does not worsen the controlling scour response. Overall, the replacement improves hydraulic compatibility, reduces local hydraulic stress, and does not worsen the governing scour response. The study supports SDG 9, SDG 11, and SDG 13 in a hydraulic-infrastructure sense by promoting resilient bridge serviceability, safer transport connectivity, and adaptation-oriented flood risk assessment; however, full life-cycle carbon, cost, and network-resilience metrics were outside the scope.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(7)
University of Jordan (JO), Water Authority of Jordan (JO), Jordan Hospital (JO), Murphy Oil Corporation (United States) (US), Al-Balqa Applied University (JO), National Energy Research Center (JO), Ministry of Health (JO), University of South Alabama (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.