Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Bleeding Risk Assessment and Management

Bleeding is one of the most common and feared complications after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is associated with longer hospital stays, higher mortality, and worse clinical outcomes. As the number of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) continues to grow, preventing bleeding has become an important part of PCI management. This practical review summarizes current evidence on how to assess bleeding risk and reduce bleeding before, during, and after PCI. Several tools, including the BARC classification, ARC-HBR criteria, PRECISE-DAPT, and DAPT scores, help identify patients who may benefit from tailored treatment. Current strategies include the use of radial access, optimized anticoagulation, appropriate selection of antiplatelet therapy, newer-generation drug-eluting stents, and shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in selected HBR patients. We also discuss the management of patients with atrial fibrillation requiring oral anticoagulation, as well as those with anemia or thrombocytopenia. Although significant progress has been made, several questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding transfusion thresholds, antithrombotic therapy in complex patients, and the best balance between bleeding and ischemic risks. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to provide further evidence and help improve the management of patients undergoing PCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15145729
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Bleeding Risk Assessment and Management

Adil Salihu, Aurelia Zimmerli, David Meier, Emmanuelle Scala et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Bleeding Risk Assessment and Management

Adil Salihu, Aurelia Zimmerli, David Meier, Emmanuelle Scala, Thabo Mahendiran, Marine Klopfenstein, Jeremie Buri, Stephane Fournier
article en

Abstract

Bleeding is one of the most common and feared complications after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is associated with longer hospital stays, higher mortality, and worse clinical outcomes. As the number of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) continues to grow, preventing bleeding has become an important part of PCI management. This practical review summarizes current evidence on how to assess bleeding risk and reduce bleeding before, during, and after PCI. Several tools, including the BARC classification, ARC-HBR criteria, PRECISE-DAPT, and DAPT scores, help identify patients who may benefit from tailored treatment. Current strategies include the use of radial access, optimized anticoagulation, appropriate selection of antiplatelet therapy, newer-generation drug-eluting stents, and shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in selected HBR patients. We also discuss the management of patients with atrial fibrillation requiring oral anticoagulation, as well as those with anemia or thrombocytopenia. Although significant progress has been made, several questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding transfusion thresholds, antithrombotic therapy in complex patients, and the best balance between bleeding and ischemic risks. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to provide further evidence and help improve the management of patients undergoing PCI.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(14)
University of Lausanne (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.