External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: implications for model-informed precision dosing

Abstract Background Tacrolimus, a primary immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation, exhibits variable pharmacokinetics. While model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models improve dosing accuracy, models developed in specific populations lack applicability in other populations. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of published models integrated in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in Indian adult renal transplant recipients. Methods Predictive performance of four published PopPK models were evaluated using an independent dataset of 120 trough concentrations from 60 adult renal transplant recipients. Models were assessed using prediction based and simulation-based diagnostics. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) Bayesian prediction was also used to evaluate the model performance. Results A priori predictions (PRED) for all four models demonstrated systematic underprediction, with relative mean prediction error (rME) ranging from − 25.0% to -64.0%, failing clinical acceptability thresholds. However, integrating patient-specific data via MAP Bayesian estimation corrected this bias and improved precision. Notably, all models achieved higher accuracy and precision, with more than 60% of individual predictions falling within $$\:\pm\:20\text{\%}$$ ( $$\:{F}_{20}$$ ) of the observed values. Additionally, scaling down the clearance parameter by 30% mitigated the systematic bias observed in the initial a priori predictions. Conclusions Published PopPK models exhibited significant systematic bias when applied to Indian renal transplant recipients, posing a substantial risk of overdosing if used without adjustment for initial dose selection. However, these models adapted using MAP Bayesian approach or scaling of clearance parameter demonstrate better predictive performance in this cohort, suggesting they can guide proactive precision dosing in the Indian cohort. Prospective studies evaluating the target attainment and clinical outcomes are required to establish their clinical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nephrology
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-05214-3
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: implications for model-informed precision dosing

Arun Prasath Raju, Sarbpreet Singh, Agarwal Ak, Surulivelrajan Mallayasamy et al.
BMC Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: implications for model-informed precision dosing

Arun Prasath Raju, Sarbpreet Singh, Agarwal Ak, Surulivelrajan Mallayasamy, Smita Pattanaik, Ashish Sharma, Vivek Kumar, R.A.V.I.N.D.R.A. PRABHU ATTUR, Savita Verma Atri, Deepesh Kenwar, Mahadev Rao, Priyanka Naithani, Shiva Kumar SP
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tacrolimus, a primary immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation, exhibits variable pharmacokinetics. While model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models improve dosing accuracy, models developed in specific populations lack applicability in other populations. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of published models integrated in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in Indian adult renal transplant recipients. Methods Predictive performance of four published PopPK models were evaluated using an independent dataset of 120 trough concentrations from 60 adult renal transplant recipients. Models were assessed using prediction based and simulation-based diagnostics. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) Bayesian prediction was also used to evaluate the model performance. Results A priori predictions (PRED) for all four models demonstrated systematic underprediction, with relative mean prediction error (rME) ranging from − 25.0% to -64.0%, failing clinical acceptability thresholds. However, integrating patient-specific data via MAP Bayesian estimation corrected this bias and improved precision. Notably, all models achieved higher accuracy and precision, with more than 60% of individual predictions falling within $$\:\pm\:20\text{\%}$$ ( $$\:{F}_{20}$$ ) of the observed values. Additionally, scaling down the clearance parameter by 30% mitigated the systematic bias observed in the initial a priori predictions. Conclusions Published PopPK models exhibited significant systematic bias when applied to Indian renal transplant recipients, posing a substantial risk of overdosing if used without adjustment for initial dose selection. However, these models adapted using MAP Bayesian approach or scaling of clearance parameter demonstrate better predictive performance in this cohort, suggesting they can guide proactive precision dosing in the Indian cohort. Prospective studies evaluating the target attainment and clinical outcomes are required to establish their clinical applicability.

BMC Nephrology
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.