Ecology of Abandonment: Non‐Take‐Up of Social Rights as a Capitalist Critique

Social protection is often presented as a compassionate response to vulnerability, linking care and inclusion through the lens of autonomy. However, access to social rights is increasingly conditional on activation requirements and compliance with labour market standards. Based on ethnographic research conducted in Switzerland, this article analyzes non‐take‐up of social rights not as a simple lack of information or a failure of inclusion, but as a socially and morally situated response to these forms of conditional compassion. Using the conceptual framework of an ecology of abandonment, the article shows how some people interpret social policies not as protective measures but as mechanisms of re‐commodification (Polanyi, 2001) and moral control. In this context, non‐take‐up can constitute an infra‐political critique of the welfare state, expressed through ordinary practices of refusal or distancing from institutions. The analysis also highlights how these practices are accompanied by a relocation of care towards informal moral economies based on family, community, or collective relationships, which are unevenly accessible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Inclusion
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.12063
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecology of Abandonment: Non‐Take‐Up of Social Rights as a Capitalist Critique

Frédérique Leresche
Social Inclusion
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Ecology of Abandonment: Non‐Take‐Up of Social Rights as a Capitalist Critique

Frédérique Leresche
article en

Abstract

Social protection is often presented as a compassionate response to vulnerability, linking care and inclusion through the lens of autonomy. However, access to social rights is increasingly conditional on activation requirements and compliance with labour market standards. Based on ethnographic research conducted in Switzerland, this article analyzes non‐take‐up of social rights not as a simple lack of information or a failure of inclusion, but as a socially and morally situated response to these forms of conditional compassion. Using the conceptual framework of an ecology of abandonment, the article shows how some people interpret social policies not as protective measures but as mechanisms of re‐commodification (Polanyi, 2001) and moral control. In this context, non‐take‐up can constitute an infra‐political critique of the welfare state, expressed through ordinary practices of refusal or distancing from institutions. The analysis also highlights how these practices are accompanied by a relocation of care towards informal moral economies based on family, community, or collective relationships, which are unevenly accessible.

Social InclusionVol. 14
HES-SO Fribourg (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ecology of Abandonment: Non‐Take‐Up of Social Rights as a Capitalist Critique — Frédérique Leresche · Social Inclusion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS