What Drives Learners to Keep Using Chatbots? An Extended TCT Modeling in Higher Education

The rapid integration of conversational AI tools in higher education necessitates a deeper understanding of learners’ sustained engagement with chatbot systems. This study investigated the cognitive, affective, and value-based determinants of higher education learners’ intention to continue using AI chatbot assistance with the extended Technology Continuance Theory (TCT). Data were collected from 600 Indian higher education learners and analyzed using Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM). The results demonstrate that perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) play central roles in shaping learners’ attitudes (ATT), satisfaction (SAT), and continuance intention (CI). Confirmation (CON) emerged as a critical post-adoption factor, significantly influencing PU, SAT, and affective support (AS). Notably, AS and academic value (AV) contributed uniquely to learners’ CI, highlighting the AI chatbot’s socio-emotional and instrumental dimensions. ATT and SAT were also identified as strong predictors of sustained usage, and AI Self-Efficacy (AISE) positively influenced PEU. The model explained substantial variance in key endogenous constructs with CI ( R 2 = 0.740), thereby underpinning the model’s strong explanatory power. The findings extend TCT by integrating affective and academic value dimensions within chatbot-mediated learning contexts. Implications emphasize responsible pedagogical integration, balancing efficiency and emotional support with critical engagement, transparency, and meaningful human interaction in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331261469358
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Drives Learners to Keep Using Chatbots? An Extended TCT Modeling in Higher Education

V. P. Joshith, K. Kavitha
Journal of Educational Computing Research
AI in Service Interactions
article

What Drives Learners to Keep Using Chatbots? An Extended TCT Modeling in Higher Education

V. P. Joshith, K. Kavitha
article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of conversational AI tools in higher education necessitates a deeper understanding of learners’ sustained engagement with chatbot systems. This study investigated the cognitive, affective, and value-based determinants of higher education learners’ intention to continue using AI chatbot assistance with the extended Technology Continuance Theory (TCT). Data were collected from 600 Indian higher education learners and analyzed using Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM). The results demonstrate that perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) play central roles in shaping learners’ attitudes (ATT), satisfaction (SAT), and continuance intention (CI). Confirmation (CON) emerged as a critical post-adoption factor, significantly influencing PU, SAT, and affective support (AS). Notably, AS and academic value (AV) contributed uniquely to learners’ CI, highlighting the AI chatbot’s socio-emotional and instrumental dimensions. ATT and SAT were also identified as strong predictors of sustained usage, and AI Self-Efficacy (AISE) positively influenced PEU. The model explained substantial variance in key endogenous constructs with CI ( R 2 = 0.740), thereby underpinning the model’s strong explanatory power. The findings extend TCT by integrating affective and academic value dimensions within chatbot-mediated learning contexts. Implications emphasize responsible pedagogical integration, balancing efficiency and emotional support with critical engagement, transparency, and meaningful human interaction in higher education.

Journal of Educational Computing Research
Central University of Kerala (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.