Does intensive medical nutrition therapy (IMNT) reduce overall mortality in comparison to standard nutrition support care (SNSC) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients? – An Update
Objective: To test whether selection bias has affected the reported effect estimate for IMNT in comparison to SNSC (RD –0.24. 95%CI: -0.43 to -0.05), concerning overall mortality in ICU patients. Method: Trial adjusted, simulated comparator trial (SCT) based I2 test for single randomised controlled trials, using revised I2 threshold limits. Result: A baseline covariate imbalance, either due to chance or due to selection bias was established, being equivalent to selection bias level = B% 50-60 (Bias category = 3). This level suggests that 41-60% of (32 – 47 of the total 78) subjects were non-randomly allocated in favour of one treatment group above the other.. Conclusion: The effect estimate reported by the tested trial suggests a significantly higher overall mortality in the IMNT intervention group. The selection bias level, estimated by use of the trial adjusted, simulated comparator trial (SCT) based I2 test for single RCTs, B% = 50-60%, appears to be high enough in order to have affected the reported estimate. In line with new findings, this report updates previous report to the same RCT: EBSM Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026 Pages 35-38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18456995.
Authors
- Steffen Mickenautsch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-2328)
Institutions
- Rotordynamics-Seal Research (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
- Published
- 2026-07-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17613/ndtwq-44724
- Primary Topic
- Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00