Does intensive medical nutrition therapy (IMNT) reduce overall mortality in comparison to standard nutrition support care (SNSC) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients? – An Update

Objective: To test whether selection bias has affected the reported effect estimate for IMNT in comparison to SNSC (RD –0.24. 95%CI: -0.43 to -0.05), concerning overall mortality in ICU patients. Method: Trial adjusted, simulated comparator trial (SCT) based I2 test for single randomised controlled trials, using revised I2 threshold limits. Result: A baseline covariate imbalance, either due to chance or due to selection bias was established, being equivalent to selection bias level = B% 50-60 (Bias category = 3). This level suggests that 41-60% of (32 – 47 of the total 78) subjects were non-randomly allocated in favour of one treatment group above the other.. Conclusion: The effect estimate reported by the tested trial suggests a significantly higher overall mortality in the IMNT intervention group. The selection bias level, estimated by use of the trial adjusted, simulated comparator trial (SCT) based I2 test for single RCTs, B% = 50-60%, appears to be high enough in order to have affected the reported estimate. In line with new findings, this report updates previous report to the same RCT: EBSM Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026 Pages 35-38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18456995.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/ndtwq-44724
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does intensive medical nutrition therapy (IMNT) reduce overall mortality in comparison to standard nutrition support care (SNSC) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients? – An Update

Steffen Mickenautsch
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Does intensive medical nutrition therapy (IMNT) reduce overall mortality in comparison to standard nutrition support care (SNSC) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients? – An Update

Steffen Mickenautsch
article en

Abstract

Objective: To test whether selection bias has affected the reported effect estimate for IMNT in comparison to SNSC (RD –0.24. 95%CI: -0.43 to -0.05), concerning overall mortality in ICU patients. Method: Trial adjusted, simulated comparator trial (SCT) based I2 test for single randomised controlled trials, using revised I2 threshold limits. Result: A baseline covariate imbalance, either due to chance or due to selection bias was established, being equivalent to selection bias level = B% 50-60 (Bias category = 3). This level suggests that 41-60% of (32 – 47 of the total 78) subjects were non-randomly allocated in favour of one treatment group above the other.. Conclusion: The effect estimate reported by the tested trial suggests a significantly higher overall mortality in the IMNT intervention group. The selection bias level, estimated by use of the trial adjusted, simulated comparator trial (SCT) based I2 test for single RCTs, B% = 50-60%, appears to be high enough in order to have affected the reported estimate. In line with new findings, this report updates previous report to the same RCT: EBSM Volume 2, Issue 2, 2026 Pages 35-38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18456995.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Rotordynamics-Seal Research (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.