Treaties that Tax: Legal Feasibility and Policy Implications for the UN Framework Convention

This article explores whether international treaties can directly create taxing rights, challenging the traditional view that treaties merely limit domestic tax jurisdiction. Focusing on the ongoing negotiations of the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, it examines the legal feasibility and policy desirability of embedding charge-to-tax provisions in tax treaties. The analysis considers the interaction between international and domestic legal systems, including monist and dualist traditions, and different approaches to direct applicability. It concludes that international law poses no barrier to this approach, but domestic requirements related to direct applicability and constitutional nuances (e.g. legality) should be carefully considered. From a policy standpoint, a flexible adoption of this proposition could, on the one hand, increase negotiation challenges, while, on the other hand, enhancing the simplicity and coherence of the final outcome.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Tax Journal
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/6w3na8
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treaties that Tax: Legal Feasibility and Policy Implications for the UN Framework Convention

Pedro Schoueri
World Tax Journal
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Treaties that Tax: Legal Feasibility and Policy Implications for the UN Framework Convention

Pedro Schoueri
article en

Abstract

This article explores whether international treaties can directly create taxing rights, challenging the traditional view that treaties merely limit domestic tax jurisdiction. Focusing on the ongoing negotiations of the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, it examines the legal feasibility and policy desirability of embedding charge-to-tax provisions in tax treaties. The analysis considers the interaction between international and domestic legal systems, including monist and dualist traditions, and different approaches to direct applicability. It concludes that international law poses no barrier to this approach, but domestic requirements related to direct applicability and constitutional nuances (e.g. legality) should be carefully considered. From a policy standpoint, a flexible adoption of this proposition could, on the one hand, increase negotiation challenges, while, on the other hand, enhancing the simplicity and coherence of the final outcome.

World Tax JournalVol. 18(4)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.