Beyond word count: a pilot study of the verbal fluency task in chronic mild traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND: To examine the clustering and switching behaviours, beyond total word count, as indicators of subtle executive dysfunction in individuals with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and to determine whether subcomponent analyses reveal cognitive inefficiencies overlooked by standard assessments. METHODS: Thirty-five university students (mTBI = 9; controls = 26) aged 18-24 years completed phonemic (FAS) and semantic (animal naming) verbal fluency tasks. Total correct responses, mean cluster size and number of switches were analysed. RESULTS: Compared with controls, individuals with mTBI produced fewer 'S' words (z = 2.66, P = 0.007, r = 0.45) and semantic switches (z = 2.45, P = 0.015, r = 0.41). Both groups were significantly different in semantic and phonemic clusters (mTBI: z = 2.22, P = 0.026, r = 0.74; controls: z = 3.51; P < 0.001, r = 0.69). No group differences were observed for phonemic switching. Findings indicate subtle reductions in cognitive flexibility and verbal productivity in individuals with chronic mTBI. CONCLUSIONS: Clustering and switching analyses in verbal fluency tasks may detect subtle, executive deficits in individuals with chronic mTBI that are not captured by total word count alone. These findings support the feasibility of subcomponent verbal fluency measures as sensitive tools for long-term mTBI assessment and monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Impairment
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ib26001
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond word count: a pilot study of the verbal fluency task in chronic mild traumatic brain injury

Jerry K. Hoepner, Louise C. Keegan, Walter E. Brown, Anthony P. Salvatore
Brain Impairment
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Beyond word count: a pilot study of the verbal fluency task in chronic mild traumatic brain injury

Jerry K. Hoepner, Louise C. Keegan, Walter E. Brown, Anthony P. Salvatore
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To examine the clustering and switching behaviours, beyond total word count, as indicators of subtle executive dysfunction in individuals with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and to determine whether subcomponent analyses reveal cognitive inefficiencies overlooked by standard assessments. METHODS: Thirty-five university students (mTBI = 9; controls = 26) aged 18-24 years completed phonemic (FAS) and semantic (animal naming) verbal fluency tasks. Total correct responses, mean cluster size and number of switches were analysed. RESULTS: Compared with controls, individuals with mTBI produced fewer 'S' words (z = 2.66, P = 0.007, r = 0.45) and semantic switches (z = 2.45, P = 0.015, r = 0.41). Both groups were significantly different in semantic and phonemic clusters (mTBI: z = 2.22, P = 0.026, r = 0.74; controls: z = 3.51; P < 0.001, r = 0.69). No group differences were observed for phonemic switching. Findings indicate subtle reductions in cognitive flexibility and verbal productivity in individuals with chronic mTBI. CONCLUSIONS: Clustering and switching analyses in verbal fluency tasks may detect subtle, executive deficits in individuals with chronic mTBI that are not captured by total word count alone. These findings support the feasibility of subcomponent verbal fluency measures as sensitive tools for long-term mTBI assessment and monitoring.

Brain ImpairmentVol. 27(3)
University of Wisconsin System (US), Univerzitetni Rehabilitacijski Inštitut (SI), Language Science (South Korea) (KR), Oldham Council (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.