Assessment of Global Coal and Oil Value Network Characteristics, Resilience and Key Countries’ Influences

Compared with conventional trade networks, the global coal and oil value network provides deeper insights into the competitive capabilities of various countries in the industry. Hence, measuring the resilience of value networks can effectively reflect the authentic recuperative state of energy sectors across diverse nations amid external shocks, which is highly important for maintaining global energy security. This paper, therefore, presents a directed, weighted global coal and oil value network to measure its evolutionary characteristics over the past 24 years. Then, the network’s resilience and the influence of key countries are evaluated through simulated attacks. The main conclusions are as follows. In terms of network characteristics, countries such as Saudi Arabia and Israel, which hold central positions in the coal and oil trade network, do not stand out in the value network. Meanwhile, although Russia ranks second on the value flow scale, it ranks only 15th in comprehensive node importance. Additionally, based on the resilience measurement, the global coal and oil value network has shown positive resilience. Lastly, the impact of attacks on the United States and Russia on the network has exhibited a trend of initial decline followed by an increase. The relevant findings of this study can provide long-term practical references and ideological insights for the governance of global energy security and the formulation of energy transition policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19143447
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Global Coal and Oil Value Network Characteristics, Resilience and Key Countries’ Influences

Kai Wu, Jing Deng, C R Yang, Yingying Qiu et al.
Energies
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

Assessment of Global Coal and Oil Value Network Characteristics, Resilience and Key Countries’ Influences

Kai Wu, Jing Deng, C R Yang, Yingying Qiu, Chuqi Jiang, Cheng Liu
article en

Abstract

Compared with conventional trade networks, the global coal and oil value network provides deeper insights into the competitive capabilities of various countries in the industry. Hence, measuring the resilience of value networks can effectively reflect the authentic recuperative state of energy sectors across diverse nations amid external shocks, which is highly important for maintaining global energy security. This paper, therefore, presents a directed, weighted global coal and oil value network to measure its evolutionary characteristics over the past 24 years. Then, the network’s resilience and the influence of key countries are evaluated through simulated attacks. The main conclusions are as follows. In terms of network characteristics, countries such as Saudi Arabia and Israel, which hold central positions in the coal and oil trade network, do not stand out in the value network. Meanwhile, although Russia ranks second on the value flow scale, it ranks only 15th in comprehensive node importance. Additionally, based on the resilience measurement, the global coal and oil value network has shown positive resilience. Lastly, the impact of attacks on the United States and Russia on the network has exhibited a trend of initial decline followed by an increase. The relevant findings of this study can provide long-term practical references and ideological insights for the governance of global energy security and the formulation of energy transition policies.

EnergiesVol. 19(14)
Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.